The Year Ahead: Hybrid Paralegal Roles in Demand for 2019
In Atlanta, law firms have utilized more of the hybrid role; the true paralegal role is still very relevant within corporations with lean legal teams.
January 30, 2019 at 04:30 PM
5 minute read
The mixed role of legal secretary and paralegal, known now as the “hybrid paralegal” position—that combines administrative tasks with paralegal duties—has become more common over the past few years with no signs of slowing down. According to a survey from the recruiting firm where I work, Robert Half Legal, 47 percent of lawyers plan to hire in the first half of 2019, with legal secretaries and paralegals among top legal support jobs to be added.
Why an Increased Demand?
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with the unemployment rate in Atlanta residing at 3.4 percent for November 2018 (national unemployment rate is 3.7 percent), there are more jobs than there are qualified candidates to fill them. The uptick in paralegal onboarding results in firms trying to hire more efficiently without creating many tiers of staff, while also utilizing multiple skill sets within one individual. In Atlanta, law firms have utilized more of the hybrid role; the true paralegal role is still very relevant within corporations with lean legal teams.
The paralegal position has seen higher demand, mainly due to an increased workload within a legal team and balancing that workload with budgetary constraints. On top of that, the legal secretary pool and paralegal pool is even more limited for any contract needs. Thus, this emerging hybrid role helps new individuals acquire the skill set and the right practice area experience to be able to grow with the firm and stay there long-term. The hybrid role became an outside-the-box solution to a demanding and competitive candidate market. From a compensation perspective, these junior roles start at a salary range that is typically less than the range for an experienced paralegal. This helps a law firm or company manage their budget while having employees who can balance the workflow and the critical tasks, such as e-filing, calendaring, drafting legal documents, researching, redlining or prepping files for the attorneys.
Employers are leveraging the knowledge, flexibility and technical skills that hybrid or blended paralegals/legal secretaries possess by assigning them a broader range of responsibilities. They are managing more comprehensive duties than in the past, including work previously managed by entry-level associates. Since billing rates for many legal matters are typically less for paralegals than those for lawyers, this strategy enhances efficiencies—and helps free up lawyers for other technical matters.
How Can Hiring Managers Maximize Recruiting Efforts?
Despite the increase in jobs and historically low unemployment rate, another survey by Robert Half Legal found that 91 percent of lawyers said finding skilled legal professionals is somewhat or very challenging. Here are some tips that can help navigate hiring:
Become familiar with market demands in terms of salaries and benefits. They are increasingly important in this competitive market, as firms must meet or exceed these expectations. Understand what the “absolute must-haves” are vs. the “nice-to-haves” are for the position—some leeway in those factors may be necessary to increase the pool of candidates who apply. Oftentimes, by relaxing the job description and offering training in areas to increase skill sets, it is beneficial for top candidates to accept the offer of employment and remain with the firm for a longer term.
Utilize a resource to help supplement recruiting efforts and understand the need to move quickly. Examples of this include consolidating the interview process and establishing a timeline for hiring will allow the search efforts to move to the next step.
What About Paralegals?
Candidates looking to develop their experience and morph into the hybrid position should focus on soft skills such as communication, multitasking and being a go-getter. Remember, specific processes for specific practice areas and software applications can always be taught on the job, if the foundation is there. Here are some additional tips to help paralegals enhance their marketability:
Conduct a legal career assessment. List your accomplishments and current skills. Remember, soft skills give you a leg up on the competition. Some examples include, being tech savvy, enhancing your “think-on-your-feet” attitude, truly learning how to be a team player, having a professional demeanor/attitude to work with all of the staff (firm administrative executives, accounting team, attorneys, clients and vendors), showing initiative and desire to learn, taking notes during trainings and reviewing them to keep the teachings fresh, being a good listener and not being afraid to ask questions.
Leverage professional development. Continue to enhance your skills and knowledge through advanced legal educational opportunities, paralegal certification programs and career development workshops. Legal employers are increasingly recruiting paralegal candidates with advanced degrees and/or certification from an ABA-approved paralegal education program. They recognize that paralegal certification programs provide paralegals with in-depth knowledge, professional skills and an understanding of the technologies, processes and applications that are important in today's legal office.
Tailor your resume. For each job application, customize your resume to reflect the goals and parameters of the open position.
Evaluate emerging technologies. Stay current with business, economic, legal trends and the changing nature of paralegal jobs.
Tap others' expertise. Mentors and other colleagues can identify gaps in your skills or experience, make professional introductions and provide possible legal job leads.
Payal Patel is the director of business development for Robert Half Legal, a legal employment agency providing lawyers, paralegals and legal support personnel on a temporary, project and full-time basis to law firms and corporate legal departments in Atlanta. She received her J.D. from Roger Williams University School of Law, Bristol, Rhode Island.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250