State Investigating Irregularities in Election Tossed Out Twice
The secretary of state confirmed it's investigating a “unique case” in northern Georgia. That election's results were tossed last week over illegal votes.
February 07, 2019 at 12:01 PM
4 minute read
Georgia's new secretary of state has opened an investigation into voting irregularities in North Georgia where a state house district election has been voided twice.
A spokeswoman for Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger confirmed the inquiry in what she called “a unique case” but declined to provide details. She referred the Daily Report to Habersham County election officials.
Habersham County has been at the center of voting irregularities alleged by Republican Dan Gasaway, who has been battling since last May for a fourth term as House District 28's state representative. Gasaway lost the primary to Republican challenger Chris Erwin by 67 votes. Gasaway sued successfully last year to overturn that race and then lost the court-ordered do-over election on Dec. 4 by just two votes.
Gasaway sued again, and Senior Superior Court Judge David Sweat, who presided over the first trial, threw out the second election last week after ruling that at least four illegal votes had been cast. Those four votes were all cast in Habersham County, according to Gasaway's attorney, Jake Evans, a senior litigation associate at the Atlanta offices of Holland & Knight and chairman of Georgia's Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission.
On Wednesday, a woman who answered the phone at the Habersham Board of Elections and Registration said county elections supervisor Laurel Ellison was not taking media calls about the two voided elections. Ellison did not respond to an email request for comment.
Habersham County Attorney Donald Hunt declined to comment on the secretary of state's investigation. He said he is awaiting a written order from Sweat by Friday that could set a date for a third election.
No Democrat or third-party challenger qualified to run last year for Gasaway's seat. Erwin has already been sworn in at the Georgia General Assembly, which opened its 2019 session on Jan. 14. Hunt said the county has not decided whether to appeal Sweat's ruling.
On Wednesday, Evans confirmed the secretary of state's office has requested information from him about the four individuals whose votes Sweat determined were illegally cast and who had included inaccurate information on their voter certificates. All four were subpoenaed to testify during the four-day trial. He declined further comment.
At last week's trial, Evans introduced evidence that at least 21 people appear to have voted illegally in the district, which also includes Banks County and parts of Stephens County. He said after the race was overturned that he had gathered data that at least 68 ballots were at issue. Sweat invalidated only ballots cast by voters who were called to testify at the trial.
The four illegal Habersham ballots included three cast by women who had lived outside the district for more than a year but continued to vote in their former precincts. Two women were given ballots even though they listed new addresses on their voter certificates, Evans said after the trial. A third woman listed her residence and voting address as an empty lot, he said.
A fourth resident was allowed to cast a ballot after election officials notified him someone using his name had already voted, Evans said.
Last September, Sweat threw out the first election after evidence presented at trial showed that at least 402 registered Habersham County voters were erroneously assigned to the wrong district. At least 74 registered voters in Habersham and Stephens counties—parts of which are in District 28—who actually cast ballots were given the wrong ones that did not include the Gasaway-Erwin race.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 2NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
- 3ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 4'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
- 511 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250