Judge Sets New Date for Twice-Discarded Republican Primary Election
A twice-tainted Republican primary over a North Georgia House seat is scheduled for another do-over on April 9.
February 08, 2019 at 05:37 PM
4 minute read
Third time's a charm?
A Georgia judge who has twice overturned an election for a seat in the state's General Assembly has set a new election date for April 9.
Senior Superior Court Judge David Sweat set the date on Friday for a third contest between Republican Dan Gasaway—who has been battling since last spring for a fourth term in the state House of Representatives—and challenger Chris Erwin.
Erwin has twice defeated Gasaway at the polls—by 67 votes in the 2018 May Republican primary and by two votes in a do-over election on Dec. 4 after Sweat invalidated the May race for voter irregularities that included disenfranchising district voters. He threw out the Dec. 4 race after finding four votes were cast illegally.
Gasaway and his attorney Jake Evans, a senior litigation associate at the Atlanta offices of Holland & Knight, have twice successfully contested the primary election results. Evans has said Sweat's ruling appears to be the first time in Georgia that a judge has voided the same election twice.
No Democrat or third-party candidate entered the race, so the winner of the third primary will take his seat as the House District 28 representative. The district includes Habersham, Banks, and Stephens counties. Erwin, who was sworn in as a state House member in January after he was declared the winner, is currently representing the district while the General Assembly is in session.
On Friday, Erwin's counsel Bryan Tyson of Atlanta's Strickland Brockington Lewis wouldn't comment on Erwin's status or say whether he has stepped down as a House member. Sweat invalidated the election from the bench on Feb. 1. The judge filed his written order Friday.
State law is clear that, once a judge has entered a final judgment ordering a new election, “the person sworn into such office shall cease to hold the office and shall cease to exercise the powers, duties, and privileges of the office immediately.”
On Thursday, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffsenperger's office confirmed it is investigating voting irregularities associated with the twice-tainted race centering on Habersham County. Habersham election officials and the county attorney have declined to comment on the investigation.
A spokeswoman for U.S. Rep. Doug Collins, the new ranking minority member of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee who represents the contested district, said Collins is aware of the controversy but was too busy to respond to questions from The Daily Report about the judge's findings. Collins has opposed a federal bill calling for sweeping election reforms—some of which address criticisms directed specifically at Georgia while now-Gov. Brian Kemp was secretary of state.
In his inaugural speech as ranking member, Collins—a pastor who earned his law degree from Atlanta's John Marshall Law School—called for the defeat of H.R. 1. The bill seeks to eliminate partisan gerrymandering, boost election security, establish more transparent controls on campaign financing, bolster voter registration and access to the polls, curtail voter purges, install state voting systems with auditable paper trails and prohibit state chief election officers from engaging in political activities.
Collins said at a Jan. 29 hearing on the bill that it would “deprive state voters of their own right to determine their state's voting qualifications, district lines and means of guarding against ballot fraud.”
He also dubbed the bill—which is called the “For the People Act of 2017—as a “For the Lawyers Act” and a “For the Unelected Judges Act.” Collins claimed the bill would “allow disgruntled voters and activist groups, who are intent on getting federal judges to overturn elections, the ability to file unlimited private lawsuits.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250