Georgia Jury Awards $736K for Sideswipe by Truck
A jury with two truck drivers awarded $736,000 to a woman who said a truck sideswiped her car on Interstate 285 and kept going.
February 11, 2019 at 05:13 PM
3 minute read
A Gwinnett County State Court jury awarded $736,000 to a woman whose 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser was sideswiped by a truck that she chased down on Interstate 285, honking until the driver pulled over.
The defense presented a poster-sized pictures showing limited damage to the PT Cruiser, and a police report noting that its driver, Nancy Wells, wasn't complaining of injury as she confronted the trucker after the collision in November 2014.
Defense attorneys Bruce Taylor and Melody Kiella of Drew Eckl Farnham represented the truck driver, Michael Senior, his company, VIP Auto Logistics, and its insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Co.
They denied that the shoulder injuries Wells claimed were caused by the sideswipe and denied claims of bad faith, according to the defense outline in the consolidated pretrial order.
Through the police report, they were able to show that their driver had not been cited for hit-and-run or for violating any Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, but only for failure to maintain lane.
The defense attorneys couldn't be reached.
The trial before Judge Shawn Bratton was for damages-only, as Bratton had already struck the defendant's answer for failure to appear at depositions.
The jury returned a verdict on Wednesday, the third day of trial, awarding $175,921 for past medical expenses, $350,000 for pain and suffering and $210,368 for legal costs.
Wells was represented by Michael Neff, Dwayne Adams, Susan Cremer and Shane Peagler of Neff Law. They managed to convince the jury that two shoulder surgeries she underwent after the accident were a result of the truck hitting the driver's side of her PT Cruiser. They said they presented testimony from her treating physician to rule out other causes for her shoulder surgeries. And they said they offered testimony from a trucking expert to say the driver who hit her violated safety rules, admitting he was rushing to make a delivery when he sideswiped the Cruiser and kept going.
The Neff team said the defense offered $300,000 to settle before the trial and $400,000 during the trial. But the Neff team asked for $600,000. Settlement discussions ended there, they said.
Neff said jury selection was unique in that it resulted in selecting two professional truck drivers to sit on the jury.
“It was a gutsy move,” Neff said. “My first thought was not to keep them on the jury. Dwayne and Shane talked me into not using peremptory challenges on them.”
“Our case wasn't against all truck drivers,” Adams said. “It was against a truck driver and trucking company who didn't follow the basic safety rules. We trusted the two truck drivers would follow the rules and do the right thing while on the jury.”
The case is Wells v. Senior, No. 16-C-06477-2.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPanel to Decide if Governor Should Suspend Georgia Lawyer From Elected Post
4 minute readBig Tech Is Cozying Up to President Trump. Here's Why Their Lawyers Are Cautiously Optimistic
Trending Stories
- 1In Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
- 2Jury Seated in Glynn County Trial of Ex-Prosecutor Accused of Shielding Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 3Ex-Archegos CFO Gets 8-Year Prison Sentence for Fraud Scheme
- 4Judges Split Over Whether Indigent Prisoners Bringing Suit Must Each Pay Filing Fee
- 5Law Firms Report Wide Growth, Successful Billing Rate Increases and Less Merger Interest
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250