Hank Johnson, Other Dems Launch Effort to Bar Mandatory Arbitration in Disputes
The bills come as major corporations such as Google are getting rid of mandatory arbitration for some employment disputes.
February 28, 2019 at 04:07 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Congressional Democrats announced a package of bills Thursday that would ban forced arbitration of disputes over employment, consumer and antitrust issues and civil rights disputes.
The bills come as major corporations such as Google Inc. are getting rid of mandatory arbitration for some employment disputes, but it remains to be seen whether the measures will find bipartisan support. Nursing home residents and members of the military also would gain protection under the bills being introduced.
A version of the measure to bar mandatory arbitration of sexual harassment complaints was introduced in both chambers of Congress in 2017, drawing support from Republicans that included Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina. But the Senate and House versions of that bill were never voted out of their respective committees.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, and Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Georgia, announced the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act, or FAIR, which would end the use of forced arbitration in consumer, worker, civil rights and antitrust disputes.
Blumenthal said at a press conference announcing the legislation Thursday that 140 members of the House and 34 senators have expressed support for FAIR.
“Forced arbitration is unfair, unjust, un-American, because one of the principles of our American democracy is everybody gets their day in court,” he said. “This bill is about affording every individual their day in court.”
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-New York, and Reps. Cheri Bustos, D-Illinois, and Pramila Jayapal, D-Washington, announced the introduction of the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Act, which would bar the use of forced arbitration in disputes involving sexual harassment or discrimination. The bill also has a Republican co-sponsor in the house, Elise Stefanik, R-New York.
Former Fox News broadcaster Gretchen Carlson, who received a settlement that was reported to be $20 million after raising sexual harassment claims against the network's former chairman, Roger Ailes, spoke out in favor of that bill at the press conference. Carlson's lawyers successfully fought Fox's efforts to adjudicate her sexual harassment case through arbitration.
“Arbitration is the harasser's best friend because it silences all of the victims,” Carlson said. A victim of sexual harassment “may get a paltry settlement in arbitration. Then she finds she has no appeals. No one else at her place of employment will know what happened to her. Her perpetrator gets to stay on the job.”
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, and Reps. Jerome Nadler, D-New York, and Bobby Scott, D-Virginia, announced plans to introduce the Restoring Justice for Workers Act, which bars the use of forced arbitration in employment disputes and ensures the enforcement of workers' protections under the National Labor Relations Act.
Reps. David Cicilline, D-Rhode Island, and Mark Takano, D-California, announced plans to introduce the Justice for Servicemembers Act, which ends the use of forced arbitration in cases under the Uniform Service Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, and the Servicemember Civil Relief Act.
Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-California, announced plans to introduce the Fairness in Long-Term Care Arbitration Act, which would end the use of forced arbitration clauses in nursing home agreements.
The nonprofit liberal advocacy group Public Citizen announced Thursday that it was leading a coalition of 60 organizations that supported passage of FAIR. They include American Association of University Women, Communications Workers of America, the NAACP, the National Organization for Women and the National Employment Lawyers Association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250