Business as Usual for Talc Company's Atlanta Lawyers During Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Because Imerys Talc America Inc., the supplier of talc for Johnson & Johnson Services Inc.'s baby powder, is likely to use a bankruptcy procedure whereby litigants' claims that talc caused cancer are satisfied through trust assets set up during the process, the company and its legal department will likely operate normally, bankruptcy experts told Corporate Counsel.
March 06, 2019 at 04:50 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
|
While bankruptcies can prove highly disruptive and stressful to corporate law departments, the Chapter 11 proceeding may not take too great of a toll on the metro Atlanta-based legal team at Imerys Talc America Inc., experts told Corporate Counsel.
The subsidiary of Paris-based Imerys, which supplies talc for Johnson & Johnson Services Inc.'s baby powder, as well as to other manufacturers for their products, recently filed for bankruptcy protection, citing the 14,650 claimants who allege that its product causes cancer. Two other units of the company also filed for protection.
“The Debtors lack the financial wherewithal to litigate against the mounting Talc Claims being asserted against them in the tort system,” Imerys Talc America's Chief Financial Officer Alexandra Picard said in court documents.
In such cases, however, bankruptcy law allows the formation of a litigation trust and so-called channeling injunction that forces litigants into a single forum where claims are satisfied through trust assets. The process was used in asbestos litigation, and Pacific Gas & Electric Co. announced in January that it expects to use the tool in its Chapter 11 proceeding.
And during this time, it generally is business as usual at the company, and by extension its legal department, said John Mills, a litigation partner at Taylor English Duma.
Through a representative, Ryan Van Meter, Imerys' vice president and general counsel for North America for the past nearly four years, declined to comment about the duties of his department during this time and what it will look like afterward. A search of the Georgia Bar's online membership directory indicates that Imerys employs eight attorneys licensed in the state.
This procedure “is to address litigation issues only, and there is no hint that there is a problem with operations,” Mills said. “What's stressful for in-house counsel is where there is going to be a downsizing, [which is not the case here]. Most of the in-house folks will stay in place and operate normally.”
Assuming a channeling injunction is granted, he added, the bulk of the heavy lifting would lie with the GC and the legal team's litigators, both of whom would work closely with outside counsel to establish the fund. Alternatively, someone in-house could take on the role, Mills said.
“The GC and litigation folks will be called on to do additional work over and beyond their normal workload, so it could get busy,” he said.
Rob Williamson at Scroggins & Williamson predicted that the Imerys North America in-house lawyers will “become conversant with the bankruptcy requirements” throughout this process.
“On top of their normal duties, they'll also be working with outside counsel making sure the company complies with all of its bankruptcy obligations,” he said. “There also are a lot of reporting requirements that Chapter 11 imposes on the company, and everybody inside will be looking to the in-house lawyers to help, as well as the outside counsel.”
He added: “It adds to their job security. They'll know a lot about bankruptcy law and have another skill set.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Jury Awards $160M Verdict for Truck's Defective Design That Left Man With Spinal Cord Injury
Mercedes-Benz Hit With Consumer Class Action for Claims of Defective Wheel Configurations
Child Labor Probe Hammers Tennessee Factory, Highlighting Risks to Employers From Feds' Stepped-Up Enforcement
6 minute readPanel, Affirming $25M Default Judgment, Rules Absent Defendants Must Prove Apportionment
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250