Suspended Judge's Counsel Contends Judicial Watchdog Appointments Are Illegal
A Cobb County judge will hear a petition filed by former Gov. Roy Barnes claiming that members of the state Judicial Qualifications Commission were illegally appointed.
March 06, 2019 at 03:29 PM
4 minute read
A former Georgia governor is challenging the legality of appointments to the state's judicial watchdog agency in his defense of a suspended judge.
Former Gov. Roy Barnes of Marietta's The Barnes Law Group has filed a writ in Cobb County Superior Court contending that the appointments of the 10-member Judicial Qualifications Commission are illegal because they were not sent to the state Senate for confirmation until after the statutory deadline.
As a result, Barnes contends the JQC's three-member hearing panel—which can recommend that Crawford be stripped of his judgeship—has no authority to investigate his client, Pike County Superior Court Judge Robert “Mack” Crawford, or bring ethics charges against him.
On Tuesday, Cobb County Superior Court Judge Ann Harris set a March 19 hearing date on Barnes' quo warranto petition challenging the JQC appointments and the legitimacy of the JQC's investigation of Crawford. The quo warranto asks that JQC members demonstrate their legal basis for holding and exercising their public office.
The JQC has accused Crawford of violating the state Code of Judicial Ethics, contending he improperly directed a court clerk to pay him $15,675 from the court registry. The commission suspended Crawford after he was charged last year with theft and violating his oath of office. Crawford's arraignment is set for April 4.
Barnes first raised the appointments issue at Crawford's Feb. 25 ethics hearing, which he unsuccessfully sought to stop.
Barnes contended that state law governing JQC operations requires that appointees must be submitted to the Georgia Senate no later than the third Monday in January in order for them to be eligible for Senate confirmation. Appointees named to the JQC when the General Assembly is not in session may serve until their names are submitted to the Senate.
The current JQC members were appointed in 2017. Barnes contended that none of those appointments were submitted to the Senate until Jan. 18, 2018—three days after the legal deadline. Barnes backed up his claim with the Senate Journal, citing the Jan. 18 date. The state Constitution has established the Senate Journal as “the sole, official record” of Senate proceedings, Barnes said.
Since the nominations were not timely submitted, Barnes argued that neither the JQC's investigative panel that filed ethics charges against Crawford nor the hearing panel “is constituted with members who have been legally appointed or confirmed with the advice and consent of the Senate.”
The quo warranto petition contends that, as a result, the complaint against Crawford is illegal and void.
Barnes also challenged Judge Robert McBurney's decision to proceed with the ethics hearing. “I don't believe you can decide your own right to sit,” he said. “If you are illegal and void in your sitting, then that is not for you to determine. It has to be determined by an independent fact-finder.”
McBurney chided Barnes for not challenging the JQC appointments earlier. “You and your legal team have a remarkable knack for waiting until the eleventh hour to drop this on us,” he said. “This concern was knowable over a year ago.”
“The panel doesn't find sufficient evidence in front of us to prevent us from moving forward,” he added.
McBurney, chief judge of the Fulton County Superior Court, denied Barnes' request absent a court order.
The hearing continues March 22 when Crawford will present his defense. Joining McBurney on the hearing panel were Atlanta attorney Jamala McFadden of Atlanta's McFadden Davis and Cobb County Police Chief Michael Register.
The appointment challenge is not the first time Barnes has challenged the JQC. Last fall, Barnes contended unsuccessfully that the current JQC was illegally constituted two years ago and, thus, had no authority to discipline Crawford.
Members of the Georgia House of Representatives who led the 2016 push to abolish the JQC as an independent constitutional agency in favor of one over which it had sole oversight and control, included contradictory language about when a newly configured JQC governed by different procedures would take effect. The glitch resulted in the creation of an interim JQC on Jan. 1, 2017, that was abolished on June 30, 2017, in favor of the current commission.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250