Both Sides Cheer $500K Verdict Against Andrew Young III Over Sale of TV Network
Music promoter Bernard Parks Jr. claimed Andrew Young III owed him nearly $5 million from his efforts recruiting founders of Bounce TV, which was sold to Scripps in 2017.
March 08, 2019 at 06:46 PM
5 minute read
(Photo: RomanR/Shutterstock.com)
A Fulton County jury awarded $500,000 to a man who said he was owed nearly $5 million by Andrew “Bo” Young III from the proceeds of the 2017 sale of Bounce TV.
Plaintiff Bernard Parks' suit originally included Young's famous father, former Atlanta Mayor and U.N. Ambassador Andrew Young, as well as Martin Luther King III, but they were dismissed during the course of the litigation.
Kyler Wise, who led a trial team including fellow Wilson Brock & Irby partner Larry Dingle and Atlanta solo Michael Welch, said they were pleased with the verdict.
“It was a hard-fought trial,” Wise said in an email. “I thought that defense counsel did a great job and represented their client well. On behalf of Mr. Parks, we are happy with, and respect, the jury's decision.”
Despite the award of a half-million dollars, lead defense counsel Drew Findling, who represented Bo Young and his company AY3 LLC, said he was also gratified with the outcome.
“Obviously this was a devastating blow to the plaintiff; he wanted nearly $5 million, and he basically got 10 percent of what he asked for,” said Findling, noting that the jury found for the defense on nearly all the plaintiff's claims and declined to award attorney fees or punitive damages.
“The plaintiff had some very dedicated and hard-working attorneys,” said Findling, who defended the case with Findling Law Firm colleagues Marissa Goldberg and Zachary Kelehear and Law & Moran partner Pete Law.
According to case filings, the case began in 2011 when former Turner Broadcasting executive Ryan Glover set out to launch Bounce TV as “a start-up television production company which was owned and controlled by African-Americans” focused on programming for black viewers.
Parks, an Atlanta music promoter and manager, knew Glover and arranged a meeting between Glover and Bo and Andrew Young and King. The Youngs and King agreed to become “founding members” in what Parks' complaint described as an effort to lend credibility to the startup.
The founding members were rewarded with a 10 percent equity share, with Bo Young getting 5.5 percent of the share. According to Parks' complaint, he and Bo Young agreed to split Young's share equally, but that deal was never memorialized on paper.
Parks was also given a 1 percent equity share for bringing the other three on board.
In 2017 broadcaster E.W. Scripps bought Bounce, resulting in a nearly $16 million payout to the founding members. Later that year, Parks sued AY3, both Youngs and King, saying he was owed $4.4 million.
Parks' complaint included claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, money had and received, promissory estoppel and breach of fiduciary duty.
Shortly after the suit was filed, Bo Young filed a counterclaim for assault against Parks, claiming he had threatened to “kick your ass” and “fuck you up” and had a history of violence.
Last year, Parks voluntarily dismissed his claims against King and the elder Young.
The case went to trial Feb. 25 before Superior Court Judge Kelly Lee Ellerbe.
Findling said Parks' own testimony may have been the most important factor for the jury.
“During my cross-examination, he admitted that, after Bounce started in 2011, he basically had no role from 2012 through 2017,” Findling said.
During that time, “my client was flying around the country promoting Bounce TV,” he said.
Young's assault claim was “minimally addressed,” he said, noting that that claim had been filed before he was involved in the case.
In closing, he said Parks' lawyers asked for about $4.8 million in damages.
On Feb. 28, the jury took five or six hours to find for the defense on all claims except for unjust enrichment, awarding $500,000.
They found for Parks on Young's assault claim.
In speaking to a juror afterward, Findling said, “it seemed rather obvious that the award in many ways adopted our theory that the plaintiff offered no labor from 2012 to 2017, and they clearly rejected the verbal contract claim.”
The award, he said, “appeared to be some way to address the effort the plaintiff put in back in 2011.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Vandy QB Wins Injunction Allowing Him to Play D-I Football in 2025 Vandy QB Wins Injunction Allowing Him to Play D-I Football in 2025](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/414/2018/06/Verdict_Football_preview.jpeg)
![Five Noteworthy Litigation Trends of 2024—and What to Watch in 2025 Five Noteworthy Litigation Trends of 2024—and What to Watch in 2025](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/f1/ec/4146e868434eadca96d1a7ad353c/new-year-2025-767x633.jpg)
!['It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ 'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/a2/43/145675264c709b3eb70344741fc9/phyllis-sumner-767x633.jpg)
'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
5 minute read![Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9a/4b/4fb840a94af990f40946383be184/nascar-sign-767x633.jpg)
Federal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
Trending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250