Bambi Bedlam: Cars Stopped for Deer Leads to Wreck, $5M Verdict
The wreck near Duluth happened after a driver stopped for a deer in the road and was struck by a following motorist who then hit yet another driver.
March 11, 2019 at 05:01 PM
4 minute read
A deer running across the road near Duluth caused a three-car wreck that landed a $5 million Fulton County verdict for a woman who underwent several surgeries after the mishap.
Plaintiffs attorney R. Scott Campbell said there were conflicting stories about how the at-fault driver crashed into the injured woman's car and even whether there were multiple deer at the accident scene. Regardless of how many there were, the deer apparently escaped unscathed.
Campbell said the defense first denied liability then began negotiating as trial approached.
“We had a mediation that failed, then it was in the trial calendar for a year or so and their offers increased as it got closer.
“They topped out at $1.2 million, and we were demanding $1.75 million. So we went to trial,” said Campbell, who tried the case with Shiver Hamilton colleague Brandon Smith.
The case was defended by Neal Scott of the Law Office of Terry-Dawn Thomas, in-house counsel for Zurich North America. He did not respond to a request for comment.
According to the Campbell and court filings, his client, Audrey Hill, was driving her Toyota Camry along Ga. 120 in Gwinnett County around 7:30 p.m. one evening in December 2014. Another driver, Edwin Efezokhae, was traveling the other way in a Nissan Sentra and had stopped for a deer in the roadway.
The defendant driver, Mark Brumberg, was in a new Mercedes-Benz C250 belonging to his employer, Atlanta Classic Cars, and came upon Efezokhae stopped in the road with his lights on.
“Our contention was that he saw the taillights but couldn't stop in time, swerves left and hits Edwin's car, then hits Audrey's car head-on,” Campbell said.
“Brumberg said he saw Edwin's car, swerved right off of the road, saw another deer and swerved back to the left, clipped Edwin's car, then hit our car,” he said.
Brumberg was cited for following too closely, and Hill was treated at a local hospital and released.
According to her filings, Hill suffered neck, low back, left shoulder and left knee injuries, and underwent treatment including physical therapy, steroid injections and the administration of narcotic and analgesic pain medications. A few months after the wreck, she underwent cervical fusion surgery and later needed rotator cuff repair surgery, knee surgeries and lumbar spine fusion surgery.
The pretrial order said Hill, now 59, accrued more than $300,000 in medical bills and will have more in the future.
Hill sued Atlanta Classic Cars and Brumberg in Fulton County State Court in 2016. Efezokhae was originally named in the lawsuit, “but we dropped him, because we concluded he didn't do anything wrong,” Campbell said.
During the four-day trial before Judge Jane Morrison, Campbell said the defense stuck to its claim of swerving to avoid another deer.
“They hitched their wagon to that deer story, and (Brumberg) testified that, based on his experience, if it's deer versus car the deer wins, so he swerved back over,” Campbell said. “Our position was that we didn't believe that story, but that even under his scenario he acted unreasonably.”
“One of the last questions we asked Brumberg was whether he admitted to any mistake or took any responsibility for his actions, and he said, 'no,'” Campbell said.
Campbell said the jury took about an hour to award $5 million on Thursday.
In conversation with jurors afterward, Campbell said they decided within minutes that Brumberg was at fault.
“They said the issue of liability was not even a matter for discussion, that it was all about damages,” he said. “A handful wanted to give us $10 million, some others thought $3 million was right, so they compromised at $5 million.”
Campbell said opposing counsel had a tough row to hoe, given the facts of the case.
“Neal tried an excellent case; he's a consummate professional, but he had his work cut out for him,” said Campbell. “If they had accepted responsibility, I think it would have turned out differently.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
'Stock Car Monopoly'?: Winston Lawsuit Alleges NASCAR Anticompetitive Scheme
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250