Court of Appeals Affirms $46M Med Mal Verdict
Georgia Court of Appeals Judge Sara Doyle said Fulton County State Court Judge Fred Eady did not make any errors in the trial, even though he thought he did.
March 11, 2019 at 11:05 AM
4 minute read
The Georgia Court of Appeals on Thursday upheld a $46 million medical malpractice verdict and reversed the trial judge's order to reconsider apportionment in the case.
Judge Sara Doyle used the word “meritless” to describe some of the defense issues on appeal, affirming the jury's award to the family of Shannon Trabue, who suffered a catastrophic brain injury in a hospital four days after she delivered a healthy baby. Doyle rejected plans to retry the apportionment part of the case but ordered the trial judge to reconsider attorney fee awards to the Trabues.
Doyle was joined by Chief Judge Stephen Dillard and Judge Amanda Mercier.
Trabue was 38 when her baby was born in 2009 at Northside Hospital, which settled out of the case before trial. Her blood pressure began to spike after the birth. She stopped breathing and then suffered cardiac arrest on the way to have a scan in the radiology department. A code was called and she was revived, but she had gone too long without oxygen.
To put a complicated case simply, lawyers for her husband, Keith Trabue, contended that doctors filled her with too much intravenous fluid in an effort to address her blood pressure, causing her lungs and heart to fail.
The case was tried in 2017 before Fulton County State Court Judge Fred Eady. The jury found Atlanta Women's Specialists and Dr. Stanley Angus liable for the injury that left Trabue permanently brain damaged. The doctors' group asked Eady to throw out the verdict, arguing that another employee who was not sued, Dr. Rebecca Simonsen, should have shared the blame. Eady decided to retry the case for apportionment only.
The Trabues appealed the apportionment reconsideration order. Atlanta Women's Specialists and Angus cross-appealed, asking for a new trial because of apportionment issues and objections to an expert witness who didn't place blame on Simonsen.
“We find meritless the defendants' contention that the plaintiffs' expert affidavits filed with their initial and renewal complaints are defective because they offered no criticism of Dr. Simonsen,” Doyle said. “An OCGA §9-11-9.1 expert affidavit must simply specify at least one negligent act or omission and the factual basis for the claim.”
As to apportionment, Doyle said the practice group's liability “was purely vicarious in nature” for the actions of the doctors.
“Apportionment is not proper” between the practice and the doctor, Doyle said. “Notwithstanding the defendants' attempts to characterize their request for apportionment as between parties, they actually seek to apportion between Dr. Angus and Dr. Simonsen, a non-party under OCGA §51-12-33 (b).”
But Doyle ruled that the practice group had not given the required notice in advance of the trial for that apportionment.
“By failing to give the mandatory notice required by that Code section, the defendants waived their right to apportion damages in that manner,” Doyle said. “Thus, the trial court erred by granting a new trial as to apportionment, and we therefore reverse that portion of the order.” Winning lead counsel Bill Stone of Stone Law said Doyle's opinion shows that Eady “was correct the first time.”
“The court considered it carefully and correctly concluded that the trial court did not commit any error during the trial,” Stone said. “It was a big win for us because it was a win on all issues.” Stone tried the case with his two sons, Ryals Stone and James Stone, and Michael Regas, all of Stone Law. For the appeal, they added Michael Terry and Naveen Ramachandrappa of Bondurant Mixson & Elmore.
“Mike Terry made a splendid oral argument,” Stone said.
But it's not over, according to defense appellate counsel and former Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears, now a partner with Smith Gambrell & Russell.
“We are currently studying the opinion of the Court of Appeals, but you should know that we do plan to appeal this case to the Georgia Supreme Court,” Sears said Friday by email.
Sears worked with Colin Delaney of Smith Gambrell. Daniel Huff and Taylor Tribble of Huff Powell & Bailey tried the case. The appellate team also included David Flint and Michael Flint of Schreeder Wheeler & Flint.
The case is Trabue v. Atlanta Women's Specialists, No. A18A1508.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUpcoming Changes to Medicare Secondary Payer Reporting: What WC Insurers and Attorneys Need to Know
5 minute readBiden Administration Tells Justices That Bans on Gender Care Are Sex Discrimination
11th Circuit Allows Florida Transgender Health Care Ban to Continue Pending Full Appeal on Constitutionality of Law
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250