Lin Wood Files $275M Defamation Suit Against CNN
The defamation suit was filed on behalf of Nicholas Sandmann, 16, in a MAGA hat whose visage went viral after an encounter with a Native American activist on the National Mall.
March 13, 2019 at 01:08 PM
4 minute read
Atlanta libel lawyer Lin Wood has filed a second defamation lawsuit on behalf of a Kentucky teenager who was subjected to criticism and ridicule after his visage went viral on Twitter.
On Tuesday, Wood sued CNN for $275 million, claiming the Atlanta-based cable network broadcast at least four allegedly defamatory segments and published nine online articles on 16-year-old Nicholas Sandmann's face-to-face encounter with a Native American activist on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. The suit claims the broadcasts impugning Sandmann were done with “actual malice.”
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Kentucky, is the second defamation suit Wood has brought against a major media outlet on behalf of Sandmann. In February, Wood sued The Washington Post for $250 million over its reporting on the incident.
Sandmann and classmates from Covington Catholic High School in Kentucky were in Washington for the annual March for Life. The teen, surrounded by his classmates, was wearing a Make America Great Again hat at the time his picture was snapped and posted on Twitter.
Both lawsuits attack CNN and The Post for an allegedly “anti-Trump agenda” that spurred negative coverage of Sandmann's encounter with Native American activist Nathan Phillips. The CNN lawsuit claims the network has a “well-known and easily documented biased agenda against President Trump and established history of impugning individuals perceived to be supporters of the president.”
Those claims echo similar ones in the Post suit. That complaint claimed the Post “recklessly rushed to publish” Phillips' account “in order to advance its own agenda against President [Donald] Trump.”
When Trump tweeted news of Sandmann's suit against the Post, Wood retweeted the president, adding his own commentary. “Nick Sandmann's lawsuit against Washington Post is not political. But the bias of Post against @realDonaldTrump is a provable fact that is relevant to the litigation. We appreciate the President's support.”
On March 1, the Post published an editor's note that “subsequent reporting, a student's statement and additional video” gave “a more complete assessment” of the encounter, “either contradicting or failing to confirm accounts provided in that story”—in part based on an interview with Phillips, who had accused the teens of taunting other protesters gathered on the mall at the same time. The Post's subsequent reporting included three additional stories and a correction, the editor's note said.
In the new suit filed Tuesday, Wood claimed CNN's “collective reporting conveyed to its viewers and readers that Nicholas was the face of an unruly hate mob of hundreds of white racist high school students who physically assaulted, harassed, and taunted two different minority groups engaged in peaceful demonstrations, preaching, song, and prayer.”
Wood called those characterizations “unequivocally false” and contended “CNN would have known them to be untrue had it undertaken any reasonable efforts to verify their accuracy before publication of its false and defamatory accusations.”
“In fact, it was Nicholas and his CovCath classmates who were bullied, attacked, and confronted with racist and homophobic slurs and threats of violence” by a radical fringe group known as the Black Hebrew Israelites who were also on the mall that day “before being unexpectedly and unexplainedly confronted by Phillip, an activist, who proceeded to target Nicholas while chanting and beating a drum inches from his face,” the suit said.
What Wood contends were CNN's mischaracterizations that allegedly defamed Sandmann stemmed, in part, from recorded interviews with Phillips, some of which were contradicted later by Sandmann and by more extensive videos that surfaced of the encounter and events surrounding it.
David Vigilante, senior vice president of legal for CNN and associate general counsel for Turner Broadcasting System referred request for comment to a CNN spokeswoman who declined comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
12 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250