Over Lunch, Working Lawyer Moms Mull Their Career and Family Choices
Experiences varied widely—from women who were fired from jobs in the middle of their pregnancies to others who extolled generous parental leave.
March 18, 2019 at 03:44 PM
4 minute read
Samantha, a divorce lawyer, is 18 weeks pregnant with her second child and thinks she has turned a corner on so-called morning sickness. “I haven't thrown up since Sunday,” she tells seven more-than-understanding women at the monthly lunch gathering of the “Working Moms” group of the Georgia Association of Women Lawyers.
At the request of the Daily Report, the women have agreed to discuss their views of how pregnancy and raising children have affected their careers. The newspaper's interest was piqued by a widely-read article by the New York Law Journal, a Daily Report affiliate, about how some women lawyers were paying thousands of dollars to have eggs and embryos frozen so they could choose to have children later in their careers. The Daily Report promised to use only the participants' first names so they would feel comfortable openly sharing details about family planning and other personal stories.
The women at lunch reported a wide range of experiences. Two said they were fired from legal jobs in the middle of their pregnancies. One of those said she had to leave the office frequently while going through in vitro fertilization, leading her employer to say she “didn't seem focused.”
On the other end of the spectrum, some women recalled receiving extremely supportive treatment during their pregnancies. One of those women noted that, despite her positive experience, a male colleague who took time off after his child was born was stigmatized as not working hard enough. Yet another woman said her husband, also a lawyer, took 12 weeks of paternity leave from his job without a problem.
The women concluded that firms that provide generous leave policies are smart to do so. “I was so grateful,” said Samantha, that as soon as she was back in the office, she worked extra hard, adding, “I wanted to make it up” to the firm.
None of the women considered freezing their eggs, although some women said they delayed childbearing through law school and early in their careers.
“I don't think I ever thought 'My career is going to delay this,'” said Jennifer, a bankruptcy lawyer. She added, however, that the classic 9-to-5 workday doesn't fit with her lawyering and parenting: “I don't know how you do it at a traditional firm.”
None of the eight women worked at big firms, although some had done so earlier in their careers. Elizabeth, an in-house counsel, used to be chief litigation counsel at her company but cut back her hours to spend more time with her children.
Asked how she—as a client—reacted when hearing one of her outside counsel would be out for parental leave, she said, “Bigger firms always have someone who they can plug in.”
She also recalled one of the best outside attorneys she worked with was the mother of triplets, remembering her as “very efficient.” Elizabeth also noted that working mothers shared similar nontraditional schedules, so that it wasn't a burden on either to set a phone call for after dinner and getting kids to sleep.
One woman, a forensic accountant, appreciated her husband being the primary caregiver in their family. But the group collectively groaned at how some onlookers view men performing any caregiving role as heroic and cheer them on with comments like, “What a good dad!” and “Good for you!”
Several participants noted tension between which parent will focus on their career while the other focuses on parenting duties. That conversation can be specific—such as whose plans can be postponed when a child gets sick and can't go to school—or which parent might stay home and raise children while the other advances in her career.
“We had to have that discussion,” said Kelly, an elder law attorney whose wife stays at home with their child.
The women were asked, “Has becoming a mother hurt your career?” All said no, most phrasing their explanations as choosing between working in law and working in parenthood.
“There's always a struggle between family and job,” said Ellen, who works at an agency that hires lawyers out on a contract basis.
She mused that women who don't work outside the home may have “less bargaining power” in discussions with career-focused husbands.
Samantha chimed in, “There tends to be a lack of respect” for stay-at-home moms in divorce cases. Yet she added, ”It's so much harder to be at home.”
“Women have always had to think about this,” Elizabeth said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Kilpatrick Adds West Coast IP Pro, Partners In Six Cities Join Nelson Mullins, Freeman Mathis
6 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Exits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
- 2Etsy App Infringes on Storage, Retrieval Patents, New Suit Claims
- 3The Secret Prior Art Problem Rears Its Ugly Head
- 4Four Things to Know About Florida’s New Law to Protect Minors Online
- 5US Supreme Court Considers Further Narrowing of Federal Fraud Statutes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250