Candidate Seeks $90K in Legal Fees After Twice Challenging Election
Dan Gasaway is only seeking legal fees for his most recent win overturning an election he lost.
March 20, 2019 at 05:23 PM
4 minute read
A former Georgia legislator who twice successfully contested his loss in a state Republican primary has asked a judge to award him legal fees associated with that second challenge.
Atlanta attorney Jake Evans filed a motion Monday seeking to recover $90,975 in fees and expenses on behalf of Habersham County resident Dan Gasaway, who has been battling since last spring for a fourth term in the Georgia House of Representatives against challenger Chris Erwin.
Evans is a senior litigation associate at the Atlanta offices of Holland & Knight.
Gasaway is seeking reimbursement for the cost of successfully contesting the election from Erwin and the Habersham County Board of Elections, who are named as respondents in Gasaway's successful election contest cases.
Evans said Gasaway did not seek legal fees associated with his first successful contest of the primary last year. The requested fees stem the second contest, which culminated in a verdict in Gasaway's favor last month, Evans said.
The two Republican candidates are continuing their protracted campaign to represent state House District 28. No Democrat or independent candidate entered the race.
The district includes parts of Habersham, Banks and Stephens counties in northeast Georgia.
Erwin first defeated Gasaway at the polls by 67 votes in May 2018, and by two votes in a do-over election on Dec. 4.
Senior Superior Court Judge David Sweat invalidated the May race for voter irregularities that included disenfranchising district voters. Sweat threw out the Dec. 4 race after finding four votes were cast illegally and stripped Erwin of his new legislative office. A third election is set for April 9.
Erwin and the three county election boards included in House District 28 have appealed.
In his fee motion, Evans said the second election contest stemmed from a refusal by Erwin and the Habersham board “to do the right thing in the face of spoon fed facts and law.”
Errors that led Sweat to toss the first primary contest were made by Habersham election personnel. The four votes illegally cast in December were all in Habersham County.
Evans said he implored Erwin and the board at least three times to call for a new election and warned that Gasaway would seek reimbursement for his legal fees if forced to contest the election a second time.
Instead, they “dug their heels in and began cohesively working together to deny Mr. Gasaway and the voters of HD 28 a fair election,” Evans said in the motion.
That refusal to concede “was not based upon law or facts, but was interposed for harassment and unnecessarily expanded the proceeding,” the motion said.
At the second trial, Erwin and the election boards “did nothing to refute the facts surrounding the votes that were found to be illegal.” The county election boards also offered no arguments and tendered no evidence at the hearing, Evans wrote.
Erwin's attorney, Bryan Tyson of Taylor English Duma, said he and his client “are shocked that Mr. Gasaway would take the position that the facts and legal argument presented in a four-day trial by Mr. Erwin and all three counties was frivolous, especially when the judge agreed that the legal issues presented very difficult questions.”
Tyson said Erwin and all three county election boards will continue to pursue their appeal “while opposing the effort to make taxpayers and Mr. Erwin pay for Mr. Gasaway's case.”
Habersham County Attorney Donnie Hunt could not be reached for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250