Jury Awards $27M to Family of Army Veteran Killed by Truck
“It was a big honor for us and a big burden to tell the story of a person as fine as Cindy,” said Alan Hamilton of Shiver Hamilton. He tried the case with Jeff Shiver and Margaret Randels of Shiver Hamilton and Jim Roth of the Roth Firm.
March 25, 2019 at 12:36 PM
3 minute read
A jury in Columbus awarded $27 million for the family of a 22-year-old Vietnamese-American U.S. Army veteran who was killed when a tractor-trailer turned left in front of her motorcycle.
The verdict included $22 million for the life of Cindy Tran Huynh and $5 million for her pain and suffering in the moments before her death.
“It was a big honor for us and a big burden to tell the story of a person as fine as Cindy,” said Alan Hamilton of Shiver Hamilton in Atlanta. He tried the case with partner Jeff Shiver and associate Margaret Randels, along with Jim Roth of the Roth Firm in Atlanta.
“It was a career honor to be able to stand in the gap for her parents,” Hamilton added.
Hamilton and Shiver said a key moment in the trial came with Roth's direct examination of her stepfather, who had known her since she was 8 months old. “It was a turning point and a very significant event in bringing the gravity of the loss to bear,” Shiver said. Roth let the step-dad tell the story of how she had served four years in the Army, become a paratrooper, been awarded medals, then had come home to begin college in Columbus. She planned to study international relations.
The damages-only trial started Monday and moved quickly, the lawyers said. The case went to the jury at 11:30 a.m. Wednesday. And the jury was back by noon.
The only issue was the amount of damages. The defense admitted the driver of a truck, belonging to MDV Spartannash, didn't see the motorcycle when he turned left on a solid green traffic light.
The award could have been more, as the plaintiff's team said they asked the jury for a million dollars for every year her life expectancy was cut short, the said. She was one week from her 23rd birthday.
The defense attorney was Grant Smith of Dennis, Corry, Smith & Dixon in Atlanta. Smith declined to comment.
“Grant did a masterful job trying to eliminate the heat in the case,” Hamilton said. “The truck driver was a very nice man. He did not have drugs in his system or do anything that would anger the jury. They did not try to contest liability.”
The driver had made his last delivery and was heading back to the trucking company's terminal at the end of the day. He was a half-mile away, Hamilton said.
The case was tried before Muscogee County State Court Judge Benjamin Richardson.
The case is Huynh v. MDV Spartannash, No. SC17CV70.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court of Georgia Accepts 2 Petitions for Voluntary Discipline With 2-Year Suspension, 1 Voluntary Surrender of License
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250