Atlanta Lawyer Injured in Firm Parking Garage Awarded $8M Verdict
John Mabrey and Matthew Stoddard tried the case together for a former Hunton & Williams lawyer who hit her head on a fire sprinkler pipe hanging five feet over the sidewalk next to a parking space.
March 26, 2019 at 03:39 PM
4 minute read
An Georgia jury returned an $8 million verdict for a young lawyer who hit her head on a low-hanging pipe in her firm's Midtown parking garage.
Her attorneys—John Mabrey of the Mabrey Firm and Matthew Stoddard of the Stoddard Firm—said she suffered a traumatic brain injury and had to leave the legal profession as a result.
“The defense called it a mild brain injury,” Mabrey said. “I told the jury in closing arguments that a mild brain injury is someone else's brain injury.” He added the injury was devastating to a “smart, young, up-and-coming attorney.”
The jury's apportionment of some liability to the plaintiff in the accident reduces the recovery.
Aja Diamond Moore, who has since married and changed her last name to McCoy, was practicing at Hunton & Williams when she hit her head on a low-hanging pipe after stepping out of her car in the parking garage for the Bank of America building on Dec. 10, 2013, according to summaries from both sides in the consolidated pretrial order. The pipe was little more than 5 feet above the sidewalk, next to the spot where she parked.
“Her cognitive skills are fine,” Mabrey said. “It was the pain. The head pain is unpredictable and severe.” He added that medications used to treat the pain have debilitating side effects.
Mabrey and Stoddard presented video-recorded testimony from a paralegal for another firm who had hit her head on a low pipe over the parking space next to the one where McCoy parked. Both had backed into their parking spaces and couldn't see the low pipe from inside their cars.
Kenneth Jones and Jeffrey Daniel of Hall Booth Smith defended the parking garage, owned by a limited partnership called JPMCC. The defense attorneys could not be reached for comment.
The jury deliberated for about 3½ hours following a four-day trial before Fulton County State Court Judge John Mather, Mabrey said. The verdict totaled slightly more than $8 million. The biggest portion—$4.4 million—was for future lost wages. The jury awarded another $2.5 million for noneconomic damages. Another $500,000 was awarded for past lost wages. The remaining $212,000 was for medical expenses.
The jury apportioned 21.75 percent of the fault to McCoy and 78.25 percent to the parking garage, reducing the total award to $6.3 million.
Asked whether he had heard whether the defense plans to appeal, Mabrey said, “There will be no appeal.” But he said he could not discuss why.
The defense said in the pretrial order that the low-hanging pipe was for a fire sprinkler and did not violate the building code at the time the garage was built in 1992. The defense also pointed out that McCoy did not lose consciousness and walked to her office at the law firm after the incident. Although emergency medical technicians came to her office, she refused an ambulance and only went to an emergency room later. The defense also noted that tests revealed no sign of concussion.
“There's no radiology imaging that would show this type of brain injury. It's microscopic,” Mabrey said. “It's diagnosed by the patient's history.”
Her neurologist provided helpful testimony about the extent of her pain and her efforts to recover, Mabrey said. Also helpful was the testimony of biomechanical and conspicuity experts, he said. The plaintiff's expert testified that, at the very least, instead of having the low pipe painted the same color as the walls, “paint it red and put a sign on it,” Mabrey said. “Make it more conspicuous.”
Mabrey said he also thought the defense expert was helpful to the plaintiff's side on cross-examination. When asked whether painting the pipe red would make it more conspicuous, the defense expert replied, “I need to do more research on that,” according to Mabrey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute read'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250