Yelp Files Anti-SLAPP Motion to Dismiss Lawsuit
"It is in the public interest to encourage participation by the citizens of Georgia in matters of public significance and public interest through the exercise of their constitutional rights of petition and freedom of speech," Yelp said, quoting state law.
March 29, 2019 at 10:09 AM
3 minute read
Yelp, the online forum, is battling a lawsuit in Marietta on free speech grounds.
A day care center operator sued Yelp over comments posted by a parent who withdrew a child. Primrose School, owned by Roper & Sons, said in the complaint that the comments were “unfavorable and completely false statements about an alleged occurrence at that facility” in November 2018.
The lawsuit first accused Yelp of libel but was later amended to delete that allegation. The amended complaint still contends that businesses have the “absolute right to be excluded” from Yelp sites and social media platforms. The day care asked the court to “issue an order directing” Yelp to remove any mention of the business.
Yelp responded with a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the basis of state law restricting strategic lawsuits against public participation, known as the anti-SLAPP statute, O.C.G.A. § 9-11-11.1.
“When enacting the expanded version of the statute, the General Assembly declared 'it is in the public interest to encourage participation by the citizens of Georgia in matters of public significance and public interest through the exercise of their constitutional rights of petition and freedom of speech' and that 'the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of petition and freedom of speech should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process,'” Yelp said. “To accomplish these goals, the General Assembly made clear that the revised anti-SLAPP statute 'shall be construed broadly.'”
Yelp also seeks protection from Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1).
The Communications Decency Act “provides expansive immunity to online service providers, like Yelp, from claims arising from their publication of third-party content, like the consumer reviews and business listings at issue here,” Yelp's motion to dismiss said. “Likewise, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights of the Georgia Constitution protect both Yelp and the speech posted by others on its platform.”
In a footnote, Yelp said the day care owners “took advantage” of “free services to communicate with prospective customers about their businesses” and registered the Primrose school in Acworth. The terms of service specify that “Yelp is not required to remove content a user deems objectionable.”
Primrose is being represented by Marietta family lawyer Michael Kramer.
“I'd be more than happy to give you my comments after we file our response to their anti-SLAPP motion and our abusive litigation notice,” Kramer said Thursday by email. “They will be filed by April 5.”
Yelp is being represented by First Amendment lawyer Derek Bauer of BakerHostetler.
“While I don't think it is a particularly challenging claim to deal with, it does implicate the rights of Georgia consumers to receive critical information about Georgia businesses, most importantly businesses that carry the awesome fiduciary responsibility of caring for young children,” Bauer said in an email. “So to me it is an important case that we will ask the courts to take very seriously.”
Both sides have asked for attorney fees and litigation expenses.
The case is pending before Cobb County Superior Court Judge LaTain Kell. A hearing date has not been set on the anti-SLAPP motion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250