QuikTrip Wins Dismissal of Lawsuit Over Parking Lot Murder
“The Court agrees with QuikTrip that there were no prior incidents that were sufficient to put QuikTrip or any of its employees on notice of the allegedly dangerous condition of not having a security guard on weekday nights,” ruled Senior Judge Clarence Cooper.
April 01, 2019 at 03:27 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has thrown out a premises liability lawsuit against QuikTrip over a man who was murdered in a convenience store parking lot.
“As a matter of law, a proprietor's duty of ordinary care toward its invitees does not normally include taking measures to protect them against the intervening criminal acts of third parties, as such acts usually are unforeseeable,” Senior Judge Clarence Cooper of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia said Friday in an order granting QuikTrip's motion to dismiss. “The shooting death of Andrew Spencer was not reasonably foreseeable, as prior crimes in the QuikTrip parking lot were not substantially similar and did not establish foreseeability.”
Nicole Leet and Michael Rust of Gray Rust St. Amand Moffett & Brieske defended QuikTrip. Pete Law of Law & Moran represented Spencer's mother. The lawyers did not have an immediate comment.
“It was an every-night thing for sometimes-intoxicated customers to come to QuikTrip after leaving Follies, one of the nearby clubs, between 3:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m.,” Cooper wrote.
Spencer died outside a QuikTrip at 4050 Buford Highway in Chamblee in the early morning hours of Dec. 20, 2016. He and a friend had gone inside for about two minutes after leaving a nearby strip club at 3:20 a.m. After a silent encounter near the store's hot dog stand, a gang member mistook Spencer and his friend for rivals, according to Cooper.
Testimony and security film showed the gang member walked outside first, went to his vehicle, took out a gun and started pacing near the door waiting for Spencer and his friend to leave, Cooper said.
“You guys were looking at me funny in the store,” the shooter said, according to the friend's testimony. “Y'all out here fake reppin'.”
The friend took the statement to be a reference to gang affiliation, but neither he nor Spencer were in a gang, Cooper said. The gang member shot anyway, killing Spencer.
Law and Moran had argued that QuikTrip was negligent for not having a security officer on duty to observe the confrontation and intervene to de-escalate it.
Leet's successful argument defending QuikTrip seemed to hang on the day of the week. The company employed a security guard on Friday and Saturday nights—which happened to be when previous violent crimes had taken place—but not on weeknights.
“Plaintiffs allege that, if there had been a security guard outside the QuikTrip store on the Thursday in question, this incident would not have happened,” Cooper said. “However, none of the prior incidents involving gun violence would have drawn QuikTrip's attention to the need to have a security guard on the premises on weekday nights or on Thursdays, in particular.”
Other incidents of gunshots outside the store had been on weekends. They were also different in other ways, Cooper ruled. “The Court agrees with QuikTrip that there were no prior incidents that were sufficient to put QuikTrip or any of its employees on notice of the allegedly dangerous condition of not having a security guard on weekday nights.”
The case is Yvette Sanders v. QuikTrip, No. 1:17-CV-2341-CC.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStuckey's Leader Using Skills as Georgia Lawyer to Help Revive Iconic Brand
6 minute readGa. Election Workers Settle Defamation Lawsuit Against Conservative Website
4 minute readTo Woo Law Firms, Legal Training Platforms Are Combining Hands-On and Online Learning
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250