ACLU Preparing Constitutional Challenge to Pending Abortion Restriction
“If the governor signs this bill into law, the ACLU of Georgia will see him in court,” ACLU Georgia Legal Director Sean Young said.
April 15, 2019 at 12:13 PM
4 minute read
Even before Georgia's new abortion legislation becomes law, lawyers are preparing a constitutional challenge.
“If the governor signs this bill into law, the ACLU of Georgia will see him in court,” ACLU Georgia Legal Director Sean Young said during an interview Friday afternoon.
Young said his office will seek a permanent injunction with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to block the law from being enforced.
“Under 50 years of U.S. Supreme Court precedent, Georgia's abortion ban is blatantly unconstitutional,” Young said of state legislation, passed but yet to be signed, that bans abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. “Every federal court that has heard a challenge to such a ban has struck it down.”
“The law goes into effect in January 2020,” Young added. “We fully expect to be filing a lawsuit well in advance of that date.”
House Bill 481 bans abortion at six weeks of pregnancy—meaning four weeks from conception, or two weeks after a missed period, which could be before a woman knows she's pregnant, it has been noted. The law would make abortion after six weeks a crime for a doctor or a pregnant woman—unless she can provide a police report of rape or a medical diagnosis showing her life is threatened or the fetus can't survive. Gov. Brian Kemp spoke in favor of the bill both before and after it passed both the Georgia House of Representatives and the Senate—and the House again with revisions last month.
Candace Broce, director of communications and deputy executive counsel to Kemp, said Friday that all legislation passed this year is still under review.
“The Governor has until May 12 to sign, veto, or decide to take no action on such legislation,” Broce said. “At this time, there is no additional information to provide on any specific measure.”
Once the bill becomes law, the task of defending it will fall to Attorney General Chris Carr's office. His spokeswoman said she is not able to make any forward looking statements.
Proponents call the new law a “heartbeat bill” because it's timed around the first signs of an embryonic pulse. Opponents say even the name is wrong because the timing comes before the formation of a heart, when a pulselike sound can be heard only with a vaginal ultrasound.
Several other states have recently passed or are considering similar restrictions. The U.S. Senate is now considering a 20-week abortion ban, based on the belief that a fetus at that stage can feel pain. Georgia already has a 20-week abortion ban, signed into law by Gov. Nathan Deal in 2012.
Until now, abortion restrictions upheld by the courts have been based on whether a fetus could survive outside a uterus, Young said. The viable gestational age has moved earlier in recent years with advances in medical care, but both sides of the debate put it well beyond 20 weeks.
Legislators in Georgia and other states speaking in support of six-week bans have expressed the hope that their bill could be the one that leads the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the landmark 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, which ruled that unduly restrictive abortion regulation is unconstitutional.
“This is a straightforward legal issue,” Young said. But, he added, “As a lawyer, I would never predict what a court will do.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFulton Judge Rejects Attempt by Trump Campaign Lawyer to Invalidate Guilty Plea in Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrump Seeks to Have Georgia Election Case Dismissed, Cites Presidential Immunity
4 minute readFulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
5 minute readGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-81
- 2Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 3'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 4FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 5California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250