DeKalb Jury Awards Nearly $70M in Kroger Parking Lot Robbery-Shooting Case
Navy vet Laquan Taylor was shot multiple times during a robbery and carjacking at the Kroger on Moreland Avenue, leaving him paraplegic.
April 19, 2019 at 05:06 PM
7 minute read
On Thursday, a DeKalb County jury delivered a post-apportioned award of more than $69.6 million to a young Navy veteran shot multiple times during a robbery and carjacking at a Moreland Avenue Kroger store, leading to multiple surgeries and leaving him paraplegic.
Lead plaintiff's attorney Peter Law said the evidence was overwhelming that Kroger knew the store was located in an unsafe, high-crime area, yet failed to place any security guards in the parking lot where Laquan Taylor was robbed and shot.
“There was testimony the guy who shot him had been hanging out around there before,” said Law, who tried the case with Law & Moran colleagues E. Michael Moran and Denise Hoying.
The case was originated by Joseph Kuveikis of Duluth's Kuveikis Law.
Law said the defense's highest offer to settle pretrial was for $1 million.
“The offered somewhere around $12 million during the trial,” he said. “We turned that down.”
Law said his client, Laquan Taylor, “is a really great guy. Everybody loved him: the police officers, the defense lawyers, the jury. He's really an inspiration.”
Law said Taylor, who served five years aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln before his discharge, now serves as a mentor for other injured vets.
Kroger was represented by Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial partners Jonathan Krawcheck, Richard Hill II and Frederick Cooper IV.
“Kroger and its trial team wish Mr. Taylor all the best,” said Krawcheck via email, declining to comment on pending litigation.
A co-defendant company that provided in-store security for Kroger, Norred & Associates, was dismissed from the trial case when its attorneys, Charles McDaniel Jr. and Ryan Kolb of Carlock Copeland & Stair, moved for a directed verdict.
Norred “was granted a directed verdict following [Taylor's] and Kroger's presentations of their respective cases in chief,” said McDaniel in an email.
“After presentation of this evidence, the court ruled there was no evidence of a causal connection between Norred's actions and the incident involving Mr. Taylor; Norred was under contract to provide interior security,” McDaniel wrote.
McDaniel said Norred's security officer had been at the store's entrance when the shooting happened, “which is an appropriate location and where the officer was expected to be positioned.”
According to Law and court filings, Taylor was 26 when he visited the Kroger in southeast Atlanta a little after 7 p.m. in January 2015 to do some shopping and use the Western Union outlet there.
Victor Moore and Javon Ross were hanging around the parking lot, Law said.
“Laquan had an orange Camaro, and when he pulled in, they decided they wanted his car and his money,” he said of the men arrested for the crime. Moore and Ross allegedly demanded his keys and wallet. After Taylor handed them over, Ross shot him between 11 and 14 times, and the pair left in his car.
Taylor's car was equipped with an OnStar security system, and responding officers were able to use it to track and disable the vehicle remotely, Law said.
“They couldn't figure out why the car wasn't working and were pushing it down the road when the police got there,” he said.
Ross and Moore are each serving 15-year sentences after pleading guilty to charges including armed robbery, carjacking, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and aggravated assault.
Taylor was fortunate to be alive: He was taken to Grady Memorial Hospital, where he underwent 14 surgeries over two months, then spent two more months at Shepherd Center. He spent another seven months in rehab at Tampa's James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, and underwent two more surgeries.
His medical bills thus far are more than $4.5 million.
Taylor sued Kroger, Western Union and Norred in DeKalb County State Court in 2015 for claims including premises liability, nuisance and negligence.
Following a failed mediation before Gino Brogdon Sr. with Henning Mediation & Arbitration Service last April, Law said Kroger offered $1 million to settle.
“Laquan had more than $4 million in past medicals then,” he said.
Law said his side demanded $40 million before the mediation, but as the case came to trial they indicated they could drop to around $30 million.
Kroger had multiple lawyers of insurance, he said, but the adjuster “just never really engaged, he never seemed to get serious. By the time he was ready to offer some money [during the trial], we weren't interested.”
Judge Wayne Purdom dismissed Western Union pretrial after determining that it was neither an owner or occupier of the premises and had no employees on site, Moran said.
Law said jury selection was so difficult, Purdom had to call in two jury pools to pick a panel.
“Everybody kept saying they couldn't be fair and impartial because they were all strongly in favor of my client,” he said.
During a seven-day trial, Law said several of Taylor's doctors testified; a life-care plan cited in the pretrial order said Taylor's future medical needs would be at least $1.4 million.
Both sides had security experts ready to testify, but they didn't.
“We decided not to call ours, so they didn't call theirs,” Law said.
According to the order, Kroger argued that it was not responsible for Ross and Moore's “heinous actions” and that Taylor's causation claim was “mired in speculation that additional security measures could have prevented the subject criminal attack from occurring.”
During closing arguments Tuesday afternoon, Law said he asked the jury to award $80 million in damages.
The jury deliberated all day Wednesday and about four hours Thursday before awarding $81 million in total damages, but it apportioned 14 percent of the fault to Ross and Moore, for a total award of $69,660,000.
The award included $60 million for “pain and suffering, mental suffering, physical injury, inconvenience, and physical impairment in the past and into the future.”
In conversation with jurors afterward, Law said the panel had no problem finding liability on Kroger's part.
“They said that, to them, it was a clear case, a strong case of negligence,” he said. “Kroger had no security in the parking lot, and they knew they should have had it.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readWalmart Ordered to Pay $1.2M by State Jury for Employee-Caused Injury in Georgia Store
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250