Exiting Fulton Judge Would've Done Well on Higher Court, Ambassador Writes
Unfortunately, hers was a problem of timing—one that I could not solve notwithstanding my firm and unwavering belief in her abilities to serve the state of Georgia in such a capacity as well as any other candidate.
April 19, 2019 at 11:49 AM
3 minute read
When the news reached Luxembourg that Judge Gail Tusan was leaving the bench, I was a bit disappointed. In the Georgia judicial system, there is still much to be done in promoting, supporting, and empowering judges that routinely demonstrate exemplary talent, skill, and temperament—especially when they also bring diversity to our bench.
Like most judges, Judge Tusan sometimes ruled for me and sometimes against me. She set boundaries (like not raising an issue again) which I knew she was fully prepared to enforce. But, I also knew she had read the law, considered the issues, and was making a decision based on the merits of my arguments, not any of the litany of other factors that sometimes even now taint our judicial system.
There is little question in my mind that she would have made an outstanding appellate judge in either the federal or state system. Unfortunately, hers was a problem of timing—one that I could not solve notwithstanding my firm and unwavering belief in her abilities to serve the state of Georgia in such a capacity as well as any other candidate.
Here in Luxembourg, I am exposed to all sorts of judicial systems from the European Union to the Grand Duchy. And, I see and work with all kinds of attorneys. With that context, I can attest that there are few that match her skill sets and talents.
Georgia will miss her on the bench—not just because diversity may suffer yet another blow in a state with much left to be done on the Georgia bench. But, much more importantly, she brought a level of pure and obvious professionalism that should be the envy of every attorney practicing in the Georgia courts.
No doubt, Judge Tusan will move on to her next (and more profitable) career. Yet, as one who practiced before her, helped recommend judges for both federal and state appellate benches, and witnessed the best and the worst Georgia has to offer, I felt compelled to note the significance of this moment of her departure from the bench. Her replacement will hopefully bring to the Superior Court of Fulton County all of the qualities that Judge Tusan did.
The reason is simple. It is more important now, in these times, that our bench move forward, not backward, in the drive toward justice for all in our great state with the best the Georgia Bar has to offer.
If you happen to come through Europe, stop by—the U.S. Embassy will welcome you.
Ambassador J. Randolph Evans
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Editor's note: Evans co-chaired Gov. Nathan Deal's Judicial Nominations Commission until he was confirmed for his diplomatic post last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWho Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250