Bitcoin Trader Targets Wells Fargo in $18M Fraud Suit
Wells Fargo is accused of failing to investigate a Georgia attorney's law firm trust accounts after the bank was informed she was likely using the accounts to facilitate fraudulent transactions.
April 24, 2019 at 02:33 PM
5 minute read
An international cryptocurrency trader suing a Georgia lawyer for allegedly defrauding it of more than $2 million has accused Wells Fargo of aiding and abetting the alleged crimes.
Atlanta attorneys representing Hong Kong trader GSR Markets Ltd. claim Wells Fargo failed to investigate Georgia attorney Diana McDonald's law firm trust accounts after the bank was informed she was likely using the accounts to facilitate fraudulent transactions.
Wells Fargo's decision to take no action and, instead, vouch for McDonald as a valued customer with a “high net worth,” prevented GSR from recovering nearly $1 million of the missing funds, according to newly filed papers in federal court in Atlanta.
GSR's amended complaint accuses Wells Fargo of aiding and abetting McDonald as the lawyer allegedly engaged in fraud, conversion and a repeated breach of her fiduciary duties. The Hong Kong firm is seeking $18 million in compensatory and punitive damages from McDonald, several bitcoin brokers named as defendants in the suit and Wells Fargo. The suit claims that Wells Fargo shares liability for $12 million of that amount.
“We categorically deny the allegations and continue to vigorously defend this case,” Wells Fargo spokeswoman Dan Obrist said Tuesday. Wells Fargo is represented by Brent Hitson, a partner at the Birmingham, Alabama, office of Burr & Forman.
GSR initially lost $4 million after wiring it to McDonald—the designated closing attorney in a bitcoin purchase deal that never took place. When GSR lawyers sought to recover the funds—which should have remained in escrow until the deal was consummated—McDonald repeatedly stalled before belatedly returning just half the money, according to a federal complaint GSR filed in Atlanta in March.
On March 8, Judge Mike Brown of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia issued a temporary restraining order freezing multiple fiduciary trust, or IOLTA, accounts that McDonald had at Wells Fargo. The judge also ordered the bank to surrender $310,000 to GSR—all that remained of the Hong Kong firm's allegedly escrowed funds.
GSR's counsel, Richard Robbins of Atlanta's the Robbins Firm, said in court papers that the bank also “ignored its own internal policies and procedures” by refusing to investigate the alleged fraudulent activity tied to McDonald's trust accounts.
When GSR “asked only for assurances that its money had not been removed from [McDonald's] escrow account, Wells Fargo responded that it was no longer going to talk with [GSR] about the fraud,” Robbins said in court papers. “Wells Fargo falsely claimed that some bank secrecy laws barred it from providing any information regarding [GSR's] money, and said it required a court order before it could do anything further.“
Wells Fargo also ignored a request from GSR's bank to reverse GSR's original $4 million wire transfer to McDonald's escrow account after the bitcoin deal failed to materialize, Robbins said. The bank subsequently “did not respond to further communications.”
Wells Fargo was fined $1 billion last year stemming from abuses in its auto lending and home mortgage practices.
It currently operates under a consent order with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency after the agency determined the bank failed to put in place an adequate risk management program.
In the consent order, which Robbins cited, OCC held that Wells Fargo's “failure to implement and maintain a satisfactory compliance risk management program has caused the bank to engage in reckless, unsafe, or unsound practices and violations of the law.”
GSR wasn't the only one that alerted Wells Fargo to allegedly fraudulent activity linked to McDonald's trust accounts, according to court papers. In January 2018, Nevada attorney Rena McDonald informed Wells Fargo that Diana McDonald's trust account was apparently entwined in an alleged bitcoin scam, court papers allege.
Rena McDonald's law firm—the McDonald Law Firm—bears the same name as Diana McDonald's Georgia firm. After several people contacted Rena McDonald inquiring if she were the escrow agent for a number of bitcoin transactions, the Nevada lawyer contacted Wells Fargo and also filed a complaint with the FBI. The FBI also alerted Wells Fargo, according to court papers.
“Wells Fargo assured her [Rena McDonald] it would investigate, but upon information and belief, did nothing,” Robbins said in court papers.
GSR notified Wells Fargo of its own concerns this past January, he said.
“Had Wells Fargo taken action it was required to by law and by its own internal policies and procedures, GSR Markets' money could have been preserved,” Robbins said. “Wells Fargo could have frozen McDonald's and McDonald Law's accounts, and … could have reversed the wires McDonald had initiated.”
“Particularly given that this is an IOLTA account, i.e., an account expressly designed to hold money which does not belong to McDonald or her law firms, Wells Fargo's inaction in the face of the owner of money in Wells Fargo's account is, at a minimum, grossly negligent,” Robbins said.
DeKalb County attorney James Ward Howard, who was defending McDonald, formally withdrew from the case on April 11 after Robbins lawyers clawed back $60,000 in fees that McDonald had paid him to represent her, according to court papers. After GSR secured the temporary restraining order, Howard said that, while there appeared to be “a fraudulent scheme” at play, he insisted McDonald also was a victim.
McDonald now represents herself, according to court records. She could not be reached for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements
After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Alabama Man Arrested After Causing Bitcoin Price to Surge, Then Plummet After Fake SEC Tweet
3 minute readDefendant Awarded Increased Attorney Fees Six Months After Trial Win Against FTC
Trending Stories
- 1‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 2State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 3Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
- 422-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
- 5Judge Rejects Walgreens' Contractual Dispute Against Founder's Family Member
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250