Midtown Atlanta (Photo: John Disney/ALM)How Atlanta Law Firms Fared in the Am Law 100 Rankings
King & Spalding stayed Super Rich, according to The American Lawyer. It is one of five Atlanta-based firms to be ranked in the Am Law 100.
April 25, 2019 at 03:04 PM
3 minute read
The Am Law 100 rankings are out, and five Atlanta-based firms again made the list of the country's 100 highest-grossing law firms.
King & Spalding grossed the highest of the five Atlanta firms, with revenue of $1.26 billion in 2018. That pushed it up one spot in the rankings from last year, to No. 22.
The other Atlanta firms in the Am Law 100 are Alston & Bird ($812.33 million in revenue, ranking No. 52—down from No. 46); Troutman Sanders ($521.53 million in revenue, ranking No. 68—down from No. 66); Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart ($509.77 million in revenue, ranking No. 73—down from No. 72); and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton ($450.32 million in revenue, ranking No. 78—up from No. 80).
Including the five, there are 31 Am Law 100 firms with offices in Atlanta.
According to The American Lawyer, 2018 was a strong year for the Am Law 100 as a group. Revenue grew 8 percent on average, hitting a record $98.75 billion—and surpassing the 5.5 percent growth rate from 2017, the previous post-recession peak.
King & Spalding and Ogletree were the only Atlanta-based firms to best last year's 8 percent average revenue growth, with a 10.8 percent increase at King & Spalding and an 8.6 percent increase at Ogletree.
That said, the other Atlanta-based firms were among the 88 firms overall reporting revenue gains: respectively, of 3.9 percent at Alston & Bird, 2.5 percent at Troutman Sanders and 6.2 percent at Kilpatrick.
King & Spalding was the only Atlanta-based firm to make The American Lawyer's Super Rich list, which is based on profit per lawyer of $500,000 and revenue per lawyer of $1.1 million. Of the 31 firms among the Am Law 100 on this year's list, King & Spalding came in at No. 29 in PPL ($510,000), with RPL of $1,167,000.
Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, based in South Carolina with a large Atlanta office, reported the highest revenue growth in the Am Law 100 this year, at 27.5 percent. That was driven by the firm's acquisition of 150-lawyer Florida firm Broad and Cassel on Aug. 1 after launching a Baltimore office with an 11-partner team from Miles & Stockbridge. Those additions increased its size by almost one-third to more than 700 lawyers.
Another firm with a large Atlanta presence, Womble Bond Dickinson, was new to the Am Law 100 rankings. The trans-Atlantic merger between North Carolina's Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice and the U.K.'s Bond Dickinson, which closed in November 2017, landed it at No. 77 on the list, up from No. 111 the prior year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read
On the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
