GSU Law Prof Goes Across and Down to Create NY Times Crosswords
Getting a crossword puzzle published in The New York Times is "one of the few meritocracies left," says Georgia State law professor Samuel Donaldson.
May 09, 2019 at 10:49 AM
4 minute read
Here is how you have to think to create a crossword puzzle that gets published in the Sunday New York Times Magazine.
Georgia State University College of Law professor Sam Donaldson was getting on an airplane some time ago and looked at the boarding pass in his hand. The phrase “fly paper” came to his mind.
Donaldson, who teaches taxes and estates, later contacted Doug Peterson, a California friend who's collaborated with Donaldson on previous puzzles. They came up with a list of nine other clues, such as “scratch paper,” “wax paper” and “term paper.” They stood for the phrases—spoiler alert!—”lottery ticket,” “record deal” and “contract.”
From there they went to a software program that helps create a puzzle following strict rules set by the Times' puzzle editor in the 1940s. On May 5, their opus “Paper Work” anchored the Times Magazine's puzzles section, which hundreds of thousands of readers devour each week.
“It's one of the few meritocracies left,” Donaldson says of how the pair's puzzle got the OK from the newspaper's famed puzzle editor, Will Shortz.
Donaldson said the Times receives about 125 daily crossword submissions each week and chooses, of course, only seven to be published. In the past 11 years, Donaldson has created or co-created 32 that made the Times' grade and others that were published elsewhere.
Donaldson was introduced to crossword puzzles growing up in Portland, Oregon, sitting with his father while he worked puzzles from both the morning and evening newspapers.
In 2006, Donaldson said his interest in puzzles went to a new level when he saw the documentary “Wordplay,” which is about Shortz and his loyal fan base. Two years later, Donaldson went to a national crossword contest. “I did horribly but had the best weekend,” he said.
He met a host of puzzle creators, whom he credits with generously offering suggestions and feedback on his first efforts to create puzzles.
The Times pays between $500 and $2,250 for puzzles, depending on when they run during the week and how frequently a contributor's work has been published. Donaldson sounds happy to keep his day job teaching law, even as he faces a stack of final exams on his desk. He jokes that he teaches law for free, and “They pay me to grade.”
Donaldson says he does not deliberately drop law-related clues and answers into puzzles because they need to appeal to a wide audience. However, the Times published a puzzle by Donaldson and co-creator Patrick Blindauer on Tax Day, April 15, in which five answers included varying forms of “IRS.”
When a reporter suggests if this week's Sunday puzzle focusing on paper could have included the clue “paper chase,” referring to the movie about a law professor, Donaldson shakes his head.
All of Sunday's clues related to the theme used the word “paper” second, such as “crepe paper,” so the Times' editors would have dinged “paper chase” as inconsistent.
“It has to be airtight,” Donaldson says.
He explains that Times' puzzles get progressively harder from Monday through Saturday, with the Sunday puzzle expected to be at a Wednesday or Thursday level. So, if he were writing for a Monday puzzle, the clue for “salt” might be “pepper partner,” while a Thursday clue might be “ocean inhabitant.”
Donaldson doesn't mind if solvers use the internet to look up answers to some clues, referring to Shortz's refrain, “It's your crossword,” so readers can do whatever they want.
Donaldson sounded proudest of a 2009 puzzle in which all of the answers along the border were made of words like “malaria” and “Gandhi” that included two-letter state abbreviations. The theme was revealed in an answer in the middle, “twenty six states.”
Donaldson said he hears from many Times' solvers. A common complaint is when a clue is particularly hard. “If it's something they didn't know,” he says, “it's 'obscure.'”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAlabama Man Arrested After Causing Bitcoin Price to Surge, Then Plummet After Fake SEC Tweet
3 minute readArkansas Judge, Prosecutor Accused of Targeted Crypto-Miner Crackdown
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Zero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
- 2Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
- 3SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
- 4Judiciary Law §487 in 2024
- 5Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250