Atlanta Defense Lawyers Question Charges Against Stem Cell Researchers Over Iran Sanctions
Defense lawyers claim the seized items are exempt from Iranian sanctions.
May 13, 2019 at 05:56 PM
7 minute read
Two Atlanta defense attorneys say they're puzzled by the federal government's decision to prosecute an Iranian professor renowned for stem cell research and two of his former students for alleged trade sanction violations over eight vials of human growth hormone.
They are equally troubled by the circumstances that prompted federal authorities to secretly indict Dr. Masoud Soleimani last year, and a decision to cancel his research visa while he was already en route from Iran to Minnesota to work at the Mayo Clinic. Federal authorities took him into custody when he landed in the U.S. in October.
Since then, Soleimani—a professor and biomedical researcher at the University of Tehran— has been held in Atlanta without bond, said his Atlanta attorney, Leonard Franco.
The hormone—a form of synthetic protein—was seized from one of Soleimani's former students in 2016 by customs authorities in Atlanta. The seizure took place at a time when the U.S. was still a party to the international nuclear accords with Iran and sanctions against the Middle Eastern nation had been eased.
“I truly don't understand it,” Franco said of the government's decision to prosecute. Looking at the case in a light most favorable to the government, Franco said it appears to be “some type of policy argument.”
The growth hormone is not banned in the U.S. or Iran and was being used exclusively for medical research, which is still considered largely exempt from sanctions, Franco said.
Two of Soleimani's former students—Mahboobe Ghaedi and Maryam Jazayeri—face similar federal charges for attempting to supply Soleimani with the growth hormone.
Ghaedi is a permanent U.S. resident and an assistant professor at Yale University School of Medicine, whose lung regeneration research has resulted in a functioning transplantable lung, according to court records. She is free on a $250,000 bond.
Jazayeri is a naturalized U.S. citizen and Kentucky resident who has conducted medical research at the University of Louisville, court records say. She is currently free on a $200,000 bond.
Motions to dismiss the charges are pending in federal court in Atlanta in front of U.S. District Judge Eleanor Ross. Federal prosecutors in Atlanta have not yet responded to the motions. A spokesman for U.S. Attorney Byung J. “BJay” Pak declined to comment.
Ghaedi's counsel, Atlanta attorney Joe Whitley, wouldn't comment on the case. Whitley, a partner at the Atlanta offices of Baker Donalson, is former general counsel to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and has twice served as a U.S. attorney in Georgia.
But in a motion to dismiss, Whitley contended the human growth hormone was permissible to send to Iran without an export license between April 7, 2014, to Dec. 22, 2016. Whitley also argued the growth hormone is a biological material intended for medical research that is exempt from sanctions.
On Friday, Whitley filed a motion to sever Ghaedi's case because the government's disclosure “reflect a lengthy, in-depth investigation involving individuals other than Dr. Ghaedi” even though “all defendants are in accord” that the alleged conduct “is actually lawful.”
Atlanta attorney Page Pate, who represents Jazayeri, said his client is “completely confused by all this.” When customs authorities removed the vials from her luggage at the Atlanta airport in 2016, Pate said Jazayeri didn't think she had done anything illegal.
Jazayeri was heading to Iran to visit family, and received the vial from Ghaedi to take to Soleimani. Customs officials in Atlanta discovered the vials when they detained Jazayeri to question her about her travel plans before she boarded a connecting flight to Iran, Pate said in his motion to dismiss the charges.
Even the FBI reported it could “find no nefarious purpose” behind Soleimani's request, Pate said. “This is not the intent of sanctions—to prevent a former student from delivering medicine to a former professor,” he said.
Pate said that in September 2016, “The landscape for sanctions against Iran was markedly different.”
“When the growth factors in this case were seized, the United States was moving forward with … the Iran nuclear deal,” he said. “While the United States has since pulled out of this agreement, the agreement specifically obligated the United States to lift certain sanctions against Iran at the time. … In fact, Dr. Jazayeri expressed to agents that she was unsure of the current state of U.S. sanctions against Iran.”
Seventeen months later, on Feb. 13, 2018, customs agents detained Jazayeri again in Atlanta when she was headed to Iran. Pate said she was searched and questioned at length about the 2016 seizure and the intended recipient.
On Nov. 5, 2018, Jazayeri was detained a third time while transferring planes in Atlanta—the same day the Trump administration reinstated sanctions against Iran. She was questioned about her relationship to Soleimani and Ghaedi, and then arrested over an alleged sanctions violation that was by then more than two years old, Pate said.
“Jazayeri was initially informed of her Miranda rights and told she did not have to talk, but that doing so 'goes a long way' and could be beneficial,” the lawyer said in his dismissal motion.
At least once during that interview, Jazayeri said she wanted a lawyer, Pate said. “In response, the agents gave her conflicting information about her right to have an attorney present,” he said.
Agents also told Jazayeri that items could be taken to Iran as gifts or for personal use, but not for a business purpose, Pate said. “Dr. Jazayeri believed the growth factors were for a medical purpose and did not know she could not take them to Iran,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDrugmaker Wins $70.5M After Fed Judge Says Generic Sales Were Blocked
4 minute read5-Year Litigation Against Metro Atlanta Pharmacy Headed for Trial After Interlocutory Appeal Denied
Opioid Defendant Motions to Disqualify Motley Rice Over Alleged Ethical Concerns
5 minute readAbortion Rights Set to Return to Supreme Court With Mifepristone Case
Trending Stories
- 1How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
- 2Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
- 3The Unraveling of Sean Combs: How Legislation from the #MeToo Movement Brought Diddy Down
- 4Publication of Information Regarding Client Matters
- 5The State of Cost Recovery — Post COVID
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250