$21.6M Dalton Award Pushes Law & Moran Past $130M in Verdicts in 'Busy Year'
The jury award of of $21.6 million comes on the heels of last month's $70 verdict against Kroger and a $43 million verdict the month before against CVS.
May 14, 2019 at 03:37 PM
7 minute read
Law & Moran partners Pete Law and Mike Moran notched a $21.6 million award last week for a man who lost a leg after being struck as he walked toward a Whitfield County highway to stop traffic for a truck. That on top of another $110 million the law firm has already notched in verdicts this year.
The Dalton jury's verdict is notable both for its size in the rural North Georgia county and because it marks the third major verdict this year for Law & Moran, which garnered a nearly $70 million award against Kroger last month and—along with lawyers from James A. Rice Jr. P.C.—landed a $43 million award against CVS Pharmacy the month before.
Both of those cases involved plaintiffs' shot during robberies at the businesses.
“We've had a busy year,” Law said Monday.
During a one-week trial before Judge Scott Minter, Law and Moran were assisted by firm associate Patrick Wheale.
Law and Moran said they were struck that the at-fault parties in the just-concluded trial never offered any meaningful settlement despite their client's permanent, life-altering injuries.
“There was a court-ordered mediation, but it didn't resolve anything, Law said.
“The [medical bills] alone were more than $411,000, and they never even offered that,” he added.
The company on the hook for essentially all of the verdict, Lane's Equipment Rental, is represented by Stuart James of Chattanooga's James Firm, and David Ward of Michel & Ward, also in Chattanooga.
James said they will file motions for remittitur and for a new trial and, depending on the court's rulings, may also file an appeal.
“[W]e believe there are issues, testimony, and facts in the record that warrant the filing of such motions,” he said via email.
His client is a small trucking company, James said, “a business providing valuable transportation services to keep our country, and economy, strong. Therefore, we feel, for a wide variety of reasons, the verdict requires judicial review because of the serious impact it has on this family-run business and on the community.”
The verdict may also be noteworthy for the size—or lack thereof—of apportioned liability to the co-defendant motorist who actually struck the injured man: He was allocated one one-hundredth of the fault, which works out to $2,160 of the $21.6 million award.
That driver, Greefus Patterson, is represented by Brian Spitler and Angela Kopet of Carlock Copeland & Stair's Chattanooga office. Spitler said he did not have permission to comment.
According to Law, Moran and court filings, the accident happened in 2016 at the All South Metals recycling center in Dalton.
The plaintiff, employee Donald Monroe, was operating a loader and had finished loading scrap metal onto a tractor-trailer to be hauled to another recycling center. As the truck was preparing to leave, Monroe climbed of the loader and walked up to the center's exit to act as a “spotter” and stop traffic for the truck.
According to the plaintiffs portion of the pretrial order, truck driver Daniel McGuffee didn't wait for Monroe to get into position before pulling into the highway.
Patterson's pickup was approaching the semi and, in an attempt to avoid the rig, he pulled off the road to the right, hitting a Dumpster, some metal bins and Monroe.
Monroe suffered injuries, including multiple fractures to his right leg that required the insertion of a metal rod; a broken clavicle; and severe injuries to his left leg that required it to be amputated below the knee.
The Georgia State Patrol cited McGuffee for failure to yield and Patterson for failure to exercise due care.
Lane's Equipment's portion of the order said Monroe had acted as a spotter for McGuffee's truck but had failed to don a reflective orange vest, and that the trucker looked both ways before turning onto the highway.
Patterson, it said, was driving too fast and suffered from “extremely poor eyesight” such that, by the time he saw the semi, it was too late for him to stop.
“Patterson's failure to keep his vehicle under control and failure to exercise due care was the cause of the accident,” it said.
Patterson's account blamed McGuffee for pulling out before checking for oncoming traffic without providing “sufficient warning, time, or space” and failing to yield.
Monroe and his wife sued the trucking company, McGuffee and Patterson in Whitfield County Superior Court in 2016.
Law said the defense made one offer to settle for less than Monroe's medical bills and that his client never made any certified offers to settle.
The defendants worked to shift blame to each other and the plaintiff, Law said.
“The evidence was pretty clear that the trucking company pulled out in front of [Patterson],” he said. “They were blaming each other, and the plaintiff and tried to blame the plaintiff's employer as well.”
Law said key plaintiffs' witnesses included Monroe's doctors and medical experts, accident reconstructionist Jeff Kidd of Gainesville and Watkinsville lifecare expert Audrey Cowart.
“A lot of local lawyers came to watch the trial,” Moran said. “They don't get a lot of civil trials up there.”
In closing, Law said he asked for $21.6 million.
“That was my exact number, plus more for medical bills,” he said.
After about five hours of deliberations, the jury awarded $20 million to Monroe and $1.6 million to his wife on her loss of consortium claim. The panel apportioned 99.99 percent of the damages to Lane's Equipment Rental and its insurer, Acuity.
Lane's lawyer, Stuart, said he felt Minter would weigh the issues carefully before allowing the verdict to stand.
“We have confidence in the court, we know the court will take the posttrial motions seriously, review the record and make a ruling,” he said.
In conversation with jurors after the trial, Law said they complimented the plaintiffs' experts and were particularly impressed with the quality of their presentation and exhibits.
“They said they really liked our technology from Legal Technology Services,” he said.
The lawyers said they won't have much time to savor their victory.
“We've got another trial in four weeks in DeKalb—premises liability case,” Law said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Love It But Leave It': Lawyers Have Mixed Reviews for 'Compromise' Direct-Action Statute Repeal
'A Win for All Sides'? Ga. Senator Hails New Tort Reform Bill 'Compromise'
Plaintiff's Attorney: Expect More Trucking Crash Mitigation Technology Failure Lawsuits After $16.6M DeKalb Win
How a Pending Georgia Appellate Court Decision Could Affect Railroad Liability (and Insurance Carriers)
Trending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250