$21.6M Dalton Award Pushes Law & Moran Past $130M in Verdicts in 'Busy Year'
The jury award of of $21.6 million comes on the heels of last month's $70 verdict against Kroger and a $43 million verdict the month before against CVS.
May 14, 2019 at 03:37 PM
7 minute read
Law & Moran partners Pete Law and Mike Moran notched a $21.6 million award last week for a man who lost a leg after being struck as he walked toward a Whitfield County highway to stop traffic for a truck. That on top of another $110 million the law firm has already notched in verdicts this year.
The Dalton jury's verdict is notable both for its size in the rural North Georgia county and because it marks the third major verdict this year for Law & Moran, which garnered a nearly $70 million award against Kroger last month and—along with lawyers from James A. Rice Jr. P.C.—landed a $43 million award against CVS Pharmacy the month before.
Both of those cases involved plaintiffs' shot during robberies at the businesses.
“We've had a busy year,” Law said Monday.
During a one-week trial before Judge Scott Minter, Law and Moran were assisted by firm associate Patrick Wheale.
Law and Moran said they were struck that the at-fault parties in the just-concluded trial never offered any meaningful settlement despite their client's permanent, life-altering injuries.
“There was a court-ordered mediation, but it didn't resolve anything, Law said.
“The [medical bills] alone were more than $411,000, and they never even offered that,” he added.
The company on the hook for essentially all of the verdict, Lane's Equipment Rental, is represented by Stuart James of Chattanooga's James Firm, and David Ward of Michel & Ward, also in Chattanooga.
James said they will file motions for remittitur and for a new trial and, depending on the court's rulings, may also file an appeal.
“[W]e believe there are issues, testimony, and facts in the record that warrant the filing of such motions,” he said via email.
His client is a small trucking company, James said, “a business providing valuable transportation services to keep our country, and economy, strong. Therefore, we feel, for a wide variety of reasons, the verdict requires judicial review because of the serious impact it has on this family-run business and on the community.”
The verdict may also be noteworthy for the size—or lack thereof—of apportioned liability to the co-defendant motorist who actually struck the injured man: He was allocated one one-hundredth of the fault, which works out to $2,160 of the $21.6 million award.
That driver, Greefus Patterson, is represented by Brian Spitler and Angela Kopet of Carlock Copeland & Stair's Chattanooga office. Spitler said he did not have permission to comment.
According to Law, Moran and court filings, the accident happened in 2016 at the All South Metals recycling center in Dalton.
The plaintiff, employee Donald Monroe, was operating a loader and had finished loading scrap metal onto a tractor-trailer to be hauled to another recycling center. As the truck was preparing to leave, Monroe climbed of the loader and walked up to the center's exit to act as a “spotter” and stop traffic for the truck.
According to the plaintiffs portion of the pretrial order, truck driver Daniel McGuffee didn't wait for Monroe to get into position before pulling into the highway.
Patterson's pickup was approaching the semi and, in an attempt to avoid the rig, he pulled off the road to the right, hitting a Dumpster, some metal bins and Monroe.
Monroe suffered injuries, including multiple fractures to his right leg that required the insertion of a metal rod; a broken clavicle; and severe injuries to his left leg that required it to be amputated below the knee.
The Georgia State Patrol cited McGuffee for failure to yield and Patterson for failure to exercise due care.
Lane's Equipment's portion of the order said Monroe had acted as a spotter for McGuffee's truck but had failed to don a reflective orange vest, and that the trucker looked both ways before turning onto the highway.
Patterson, it said, was driving too fast and suffered from “extremely poor eyesight” such that, by the time he saw the semi, it was too late for him to stop.
“Patterson's failure to keep his vehicle under control and failure to exercise due care was the cause of the accident,” it said.
Patterson's account blamed McGuffee for pulling out before checking for oncoming traffic without providing “sufficient warning, time, or space” and failing to yield.
Monroe and his wife sued the trucking company, McGuffee and Patterson in Whitfield County Superior Court in 2016.
Law said the defense made one offer to settle for less than Monroe's medical bills and that his client never made any certified offers to settle.
The defendants worked to shift blame to each other and the plaintiff, Law said.
“The evidence was pretty clear that the trucking company pulled out in front of [Patterson],” he said. “They were blaming each other, and the plaintiff and tried to blame the plaintiff's employer as well.”
Law said key plaintiffs' witnesses included Monroe's doctors and medical experts, accident reconstructionist Jeff Kidd of Gainesville and Watkinsville lifecare expert Audrey Cowart.
“A lot of local lawyers came to watch the trial,” Moran said. “They don't get a lot of civil trials up there.”
In closing, Law said he asked for $21.6 million.
“That was my exact number, plus more for medical bills,” he said.
After about five hours of deliberations, the jury awarded $20 million to Monroe and $1.6 million to his wife on her loss of consortium claim. The panel apportioned 99.99 percent of the damages to Lane's Equipment Rental and its insurer, Acuity.
Lane's lawyer, Stuart, said he felt Minter would weigh the issues carefully before allowing the verdict to stand.
“We have confidence in the court, we know the court will take the posttrial motions seriously, review the record and make a ruling,” he said.
In conversation with jurors after the trial, Law said they complimented the plaintiffs' experts and were particularly impressed with the quality of their presentation and exhibits.
“They said they really liked our technology from Legal Technology Services,” he said.
The lawyers said they won't have much time to savor their victory.
“We've got another trial in four weeks in DeKalb—premises liability case,” Law said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Love It But Leave It': Lawyers Have Mixed Reviews for 'Compromise' Direct-Action Statute Repeal
'A Win for All Sides'? Ga. Senator Hails New Tort Reform Bill 'Compromise'
Plaintiff's Attorney: Expect More Trucking Crash Mitigation Technology Failure Lawsuits After $16.6M DeKalb Win
How a Pending Georgia Appellate Court Decision Could Affect Railroad Liability (and Insurance Carriers)
Trending Stories
- 1Corporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
- 2Goodwin, Polsinelli, Fox Rothschild Find New Phila. Offices
- 3Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
- 4How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 5A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250