Lawyer Argues Tex McIver, Not His Murdered Wife's Estate, Has Right to Sue Over Her Death
An attorney representing the imprisoned former Fisher & Phillips partner asked the Georgia Court of Appeals to dismiss a wrongful death lawsuit against McIver, claiming that he, not his wife's estate, has the right to sue for her wrongful death.
May 16, 2019 at 02:38 PM
5 minute read
An attorney representing imprisoned Atlanta lawyer Claud “Tex” McIver argued before the Georgia Court of Appeals Thursday that McIver is entitled to sue for his wife's wrongful death—even if it means suing himself and the star witness against him.
Arguing that a wrongful death suit against McIver should be dismissed, McIver counsel James Scarbrough contended that state law gives McIver, not his wife's estate, the right to sue, even though Tex McIver is serving a life sentence for Diane McIver's murder.
“There is nothing in the [wrongful death] statute to take that right away from him,” argued Scarbrough, a partner at Atlanta's Mabry & McClelland.
“Are you saying he [McIver] is entitled to … call a lawyer into his jail cell and basically bring an action against himself?” Judge Sara Doyle asked.
“He is entitled to bring this action,” Scarbrough replied.
The case is the first time in Georgia that a wrongful death action has been filed against a victim's spouse by the victim's estate, Scarbrough told the court, although he said it isn't the first time that a victim's estate has brought a wrongful death claim against a killer.
Judges Clyde Reese and Todd Markle joined Doyle in hearing oral arguments Thursday.
The wrongful death suit names two people as defendants equally responsible for Diane McIver's death: McIver, a former partner at Atlanta's Fisher & Phillips, and his wife's longtime friend, Dani Jo Carter.
Carter was driving the couple home from a weekend at their 85-acre ranch in September 2016 when McIver shot his wife while sitting behind her in the back seat. Carter, who drove to Emory University Hospital where Diane McIver died, was a star witness at Tex McIver's murder trial.
McIver currently has a motion for a new trial pending before Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Robert McBurney. The State Bar of Georgia last year suspended McIver's law license but didn't disbar him.
Scarbrough contended Thursday that Georgia's slayer statute, which bars killers from financially benefiting from their victims' deaths, doesn't prevent McIver from pursuing a wrongful death claim. Instead, Scarbrough insisted the statute only applies to a killer's claims to the victim's assets.
“It doesn't apply here to deprive Mr. McIver of his right to bring a [wrongful death] claim,” he said.
Because McIver, as the surviving spouse, retains the right to sue over his wife's wrongful death, he also retains the option of suing Carter and relying on a jury to apportion responsibility for his wife's death even though he fired the fatal shot, Scarbrough argued.
Scarbrough appealed the case after a DeKalb County State Court judge denied his motion to dismiss it last year.
McIver was removed as executor of his wife's estate after he was charged with his wife's murder. Decatur attorney Mary Margaret Oliver sued McIver and Carter after she was appointed to administer Diane McIver's estate.
Carter's attorney, Lee Davis, said this week that the claim against Carter has no merit and that Carter did nothing wrong.
Atlanta attorney Robin Frazer Clark, who filed the suit on behalf of the estate, told the appellate court that the trial judge ruled correctly that the estate has standing to sue McIver.
Clark argued that Georgia's wrongful death law and the state's slayer statute, which strips killers of any ability to financially benefit from their victims' deaths, should be considered together rather than separately.
Clark contended the slayer statute does apply to litigation stemming from the wrongful death of a homicide victim. She argued that, under the statute, a killer is forced to forfeit all claim to a victim's estate and all rights to any benefits stemming from a wrongful death.
Under the slayer statute, a wrongful death claim must be litigated as if Tex McIver died before his wife, Clark argued.
Georgia law, she added, provides that “under any circumstance where there is a homicide … there will always be some recovery.”
Because the McIvers had no children, and Diane McIver left no surviving parents or siblings to sue over her death, her estate administrator has a legal right to step in, since Tex McIver is legally dead under the statute, Clark said.
Clark also branded as “wrong” Scarbrough's argument that the slayer statute doesn't apply in a wrongful death if the slayer is the victim's husband. Scarbrough's interpretation of the statute would lead to “the absurd result of a wrongdoer having to sue himself to recover for the wrongful death,” she said.
Doyle acknowledged from the bench that the idea that McIver could sue himself “is a strange concept.” But she suggested that the state's wrongful death and slayer statutes might not completely foreclose any claim by a killer husband—who might otherwise have standing to make a wrongful death claim—for his wife's murder.
“I am concerned there is a gap” in the statutes, Doyle said. “There shouldn't be a gap. But there might be a gap.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readWoman's Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
Supreme Court of Georgia Accepts 2 Petitions for Voluntary Discipline With 2-Year Suspension, 1 Voluntary Surrender of License
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250