Federal Judge OKs Lawsuit Demanding Sweeping Reforms of Georgia Elections
The lawsuit by Fair Fight Action and several churches sprang from the ashes of Democrat Stacy Abrams' unsuccessful campaign for governor last year.
May 30, 2019 at 06:45 PM
3 minute read
A federal voting rights lawsuit demanding sweeping reforms to Georgia's current election system, and its obsolete voting machines, will go forward, a federal judge in Atlanta ruled.
In an 85-page order, U.S. District Judge Steve Jones ruled Thursday that constitutional questions raised by the suit—filed by a nonprofit organization founded by Democrat Stacey Abrams after she lost the gubernatorial race to Republican Brian Kemp last year—were not resolved by legislation passed by the Georgia General Assembly earlier this year. Jones also rejected arguments by current Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to dismiss the suit, which demands federal judicial oversight of future Georgia elections.
The constitutional issues raised by nonprofit organization Fair Fight Action, which rose from the ashes of Abrams' unsuccessful gubernatorial campaign, led five federal judges in Georgia to issue six restraining orders in similar but more limited lawsuits. All aimed to allow more votes to be tallied, even as ballots were being cast or counted during the 2018 election.
Jones said House Bill 316—which Kemp signed into law in April—still fails to address claims by Fair Fight Action and several churches who have joined in the litigation that the state's voter list maintenance policies remain unconstitutional, are subject to manipulation for political benefit, and penalize infrequent voters who are “disproportionately people of color.”
Jones also rejected arguments by Raffensperger that the state's decision to purchase new electronic voting machines resolves issues associated with the current obsolete machines, which are still in use, are vulnerable to hacking and, as such, could violate voters' constitutional rights.
“While funds have been appropriated for the new voting machines, the current [electronic] voting machines are still in use and will likely remain in use through at least the next election and potentially longer,” Jones ruled. “Until such time when the current [electronic] voting machines are no longer in use and the new voting machines are implemented, [the] plaintiffs' allegations that the current [electronic] voting machines are unreliable and insecure cannot be rendered moot.”
Fair Fight Action CEO Lauren Groh-Wargo, Abrams' former campaign manager, called Jones' 85-page order “a significant victory for voting rights in Georgia and across the country.”
“We look forward to immediately beginning the discovery phase and learning even more about the many ways Georgians have had their votes suppressed, and we are hopeful that the case will result in meaningful reforms that improve our elections system,” she said.
Read the ruling here:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1O'Melveny, Bracewell Add Lawyers to Texas Energy Teams
- 2Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
- 3White & Case Settles Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit With City Agreeing to Pay $9.45 Million
- 43 New Judges: Here's Who Kemp Just Appointed to the Bench
- 5Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250