Federal Judge OKs Lawsuit Demanding Sweeping Reforms of Georgia Elections
The lawsuit by Fair Fight Action and several churches sprang from the ashes of Democrat Stacy Abrams' unsuccessful campaign for governor last year.
May 30, 2019 at 06:45 PM
3 minute read
A federal voting rights lawsuit demanding sweeping reforms to Georgia's current election system, and its obsolete voting machines, will go forward, a federal judge in Atlanta ruled.
In an 85-page order, U.S. District Judge Steve Jones ruled Thursday that constitutional questions raised by the suit—filed by a nonprofit organization founded by Democrat Stacey Abrams after she lost the gubernatorial race to Republican Brian Kemp last year—were not resolved by legislation passed by the Georgia General Assembly earlier this year. Jones also rejected arguments by current Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to dismiss the suit, which demands federal judicial oversight of future Georgia elections.
The constitutional issues raised by nonprofit organization Fair Fight Action, which rose from the ashes of Abrams' unsuccessful gubernatorial campaign, led five federal judges in Georgia to issue six restraining orders in similar but more limited lawsuits. All aimed to allow more votes to be tallied, even as ballots were being cast or counted during the 2018 election.
Jones said House Bill 316—which Kemp signed into law in April—still fails to address claims by Fair Fight Action and several churches who have joined in the litigation that the state's voter list maintenance policies remain unconstitutional, are subject to manipulation for political benefit, and penalize infrequent voters who are “disproportionately people of color.”
Jones also rejected arguments by Raffensperger that the state's decision to purchase new electronic voting machines resolves issues associated with the current obsolete machines, which are still in use, are vulnerable to hacking and, as such, could violate voters' constitutional rights.
“While funds have been appropriated for the new voting machines, the current [electronic] voting machines are still in use and will likely remain in use through at least the next election and potentially longer,” Jones ruled. “Until such time when the current [electronic] voting machines are no longer in use and the new voting machines are implemented, [the] plaintiffs' allegations that the current [electronic] voting machines are unreliable and insecure cannot be rendered moot.”
Fair Fight Action CEO Lauren Groh-Wargo, Abrams' former campaign manager, called Jones' 85-page order “a significant victory for voting rights in Georgia and across the country.”
“We look forward to immediately beginning the discovery phase and learning even more about the many ways Georgians have had their votes suppressed, and we are hopeful that the case will result in meaningful reforms that improve our elections system,” she said.
Read the ruling here:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
5 minute readA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readPanel to Decide if Governor Should Suspend Georgia Lawyer From Elected Post
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250