Citing 'Draconian' Abortion Law, Members Urge ABA to Skip Atlanta for 2021 Meeting
Nearly 250 lawyers have signed the letter, which opposes Georgia's recently enacted fetal heartbeat abortion law.
June 05, 2019 at 02:25 PM
6 minute read
Hundreds of its members are urging the American Bar Association to skip Atlanta as a possible host for the 2021 midyear convention to protest Georgia's new law banning most abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected.
Nearly 250 members of the nation's largest professional organization of attorneys signed the June 4 letter to the ABA Board of Governors, urging them to reject a proposal to move the convention from Orlando to Atlanta in 2021.
“Our choice of meeting locations should be consistent with the association's commitment to our values as an organization—defending liberty, pursuing justice, and revering the rule of law,” the letter said. “Georgia, Alabama, Missouri, and those other states that have rushed to implement these onerous new laws demonstrate contempt for these values, and should not be honored or financially supported by the presence of the ABA mid-year meeting.”
The letter is a response to the Georgia General Assembly's passage this year of one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the nation. Gov. Brian Kemp signed the bill into law May 5, and it takes effect on Jan. 1. The law provides limited exceptions in cases that involve rape or incest but only if the woman reports an assault to police. It also permits abortions if the fetus is not viable or the mother's health is threatened by a medical emergency.
Fetal heartbeats have been detected as early as six weeks, often before a woman even knows she is pregnant.
The governor's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
ABA spokeswoman Carol Stevens said the board of governors plans to discuss the issue at a meeting on Friday.
Linda Klein, a senior managing shareholder at Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz in Atlanta and a past ABA president, said Wednesday that if members object to Georgia's law they should come to Atlanta instead of staying away.
“I think the ABA could better make its voice heard by coming to Georgia and bringing, as the ABA always does, the best and brightest minds on the topic to educate lawyers, journalists and the public about this issue,” she said. “There is so much more the ABA can do by coming here and holding a program with skilled and experienced advocates. It would be a shame to lose that opportunity.”
Klein also pointed out that the ABA meeting in question convenes in 2021. “We don't know what a new Georgia legislature will do,” she said. “But I think most people believe that by 2021, this will be out of the hands of legislators and elected officials and into the hands of the courts.”
“We don't know what the courts will do,” Klein continued. “But we do know that there are some highly experienced lawyers who could bring a lot of substance to the discussion. And the people of Georgia will miss out on that if the meeting is not here.”
The American Civil Liberties Union, Planned Parenthood and the Center for Reproductive Rights have called the law unconstitutional and promised a legal challenge.
The June 4 letter called the new law “draconian anti-choice legislation that demonstrates a flagrant disregard for the health and lives of women, as well as contempt for medical professionals” who face criminal penalties under the new law, if they perform an abortion after a fetal heartbeat has been detected.
The letter's signers include past ABA president Laurel Bellows; numerous members of the ABA's House of Delegates; a co-founder of the ABA Women's Caucus; chairs of the ABA's science & technology law and tort trial & insurance practice sections; co-chairs of the ABA's cybersecurity legal task force, economic justice and rights of women committees; the chair of the ABA's standing committee on public education; and past chairs of the ABA's judicial division and its commission on women in the legal profession.
The letter also said the ABA's decision on where to convene affects not only how the organization spends its own money but also requires expenditures by ABA members, by state and local bar associations, and other legal organizations that may elect to attend.
“We should not be asking our members to choose between their principles and their professional interest in participating in the mid-year meeting,” the letter said. Signers of the letter, among them lawyers and judges, also suggested that, if the board of governors chooses to convene in Atlanta in 2021, “Many of us will choose principle and forego attendance.”
The ABA convention in Las Vegas this year booked Caesar's Palace and included at least three other hotels. Last year, the ABA convention took place at a convention center and seven hotels in Vancouver, British Columbia. In 2017, the convention extended to seven hotels.
The ABA is not alone in reconsidering Georgia as a location. Some of Hollywood's largest film studios, which have helped to make filmmaking one of the state's largest economic engines, have threatened to boycott Georgia, if the law is actually implemented. But Kemp has fired back, saying that, while “some folks don't like this new law, I'm fine with that.”
Former Democratic gubernatorial candidate and attorney Stacey Abrams, who lost the election last year to Kemp, has launched her own campaign urging Hollywood not to pull out of Georgia but stay and instead contribute financially and politically to fight for repeal.
Kemp's predecessor, former Gov. Nathan Deal, took a different tack in 2016 when confronted with a similar controversy—the Georgia General Assembly's passage of a “religious liberty” bill that civil rights organizations contended would legalize discriminatory practices against the state's LBGTQ community.
That bill also spawned boycott threats by Hollywood, major sports franchises and businesses that underpinned the state's lucrative convention and tourist industries. The NFL threatened to reject Atlanta's 2019 Super Bowl bid—which it awarded to the city after Deal's veto.
That same year, a new North Carolina law barring transgender people from using bathrooms associated with their identified gender cost Charlotte the 2017 NBA All-Star game.
A year earlier, Mike Pence—then Indiana's governor—signed a similar religious liberty bill, triggering a backlash that included threats by the Indiana-based NCAA, the NBA and the NFL to hold all future championship games elsewhere. Mayors across the nation also barred the payment of all travel expenses to Indiana.
Pence eventually was forced to retreat, approving modifications to the language of the original bill.
Read the letter:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readFourth Circuit Seeks More Legal Briefs in Unresolved N.C. Supreme Court Election
4 minute readFulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250