SEC's Clayton Explains 'Best Interest' vs. 'Fiduciary' Duty
Both brokers and advisors are going to have to be "very candid" about how they are paid, Clayton says.
June 06, 2019 at 04:42 PM
3 minute read
Broker DealersThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
One day after passing Regulation Best Interest and the agency's four-pronged advice standards package, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Jay Clayton took to the airwaves Thursday to explain the difference between "best interest" and a fiduciary standard.
In a Thursday morning interview with CNBC's "Squawk Box," Clayton said that there are all types of "fiduciary" duties, but zeroed in on an investment advisor's fiduciary duty.
"It's a combination of care and loyalty. You owe somebody a duty of care, and you can't put your interests ahead of their interests," Clayton said.
"Best interest on the broker side has many of the same elements, but we want people to understand that the investment advisor space, and the broker-dealer space, are different," he continued. "They're very different in the way people get paid. In the broker-dealer space, you get paid usually a commission on a transaction by transaction basis. In the investment advisor space, it's more of a long-term relationship, where you get paid on a quarterly fee, yearly fee, and the advisor has a more portfolio lifetime relationship with you. Those are two very different relationships and we want to be clear."
The final Reg BI does not define "best interest," which was a major sticking point during the proposal's comment period.
When asked "what this rule [Reg BI] means," Clayton responded: "We're raising the standard of conduct for broker-dealers — the obligations that they owe to their clients."
Second, he said, "we're covering more of the advice spectrum, and one of the things we're covering that's key is account type — when you're rolling over your 401(k) into a different type of account that advice is now covered by our standards of conduct, whether you're a broker-dealer or an investment advisor."
"Before this there was no standard?" CNBC asked.
Clayton responded: "It wasn't clear enough."
Clayton argued that "the power of competition has inured to the benefit of investors so much."
The SEC chairman also challenged the idea that he was stifling innovation in the broker-dealer space by piling on 1,000 more pages of compliance burden.
"I think investors need to know how much of their money is going to work for them. And the key part of this rule package is whether you're an investment advisor or a broker-dealer, you're going to have to be very candid with how you're making your money."
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which will enforce Reg BI, said in a Thursday comment to ThinkAdvisor that "in the coming months, we will be assessing how to conform our rules and examination programs to Reg BI."
Robert Colby, FINRA's chief legal officer, has said that FINRA will either revamp its current suitability rule once Reg BI is final or eliminate it. "There's a lot of overlap between the existing suitability rule and the direction that Reg BI is going in order to mitigate conflicts."
— Related on ThinkAdvisor:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250