High Court Tosses Appeal Over State Funding of Experts in High-Profile Murder Case
Justice Charlie Bethel quoted from former Justice George Carley's dissent in Waldrip. Carley said the majority opinion “constitutes blatant judicial usurpation of the legislative function, and cannot be considered to be the legitimate exercise of inherent judicial authority.”
June 11, 2019 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
The Georgia Supreme Court on Monday dismissed an application to appeal from the man accused of murdering South Georgia schoolteacher and beauty queen Tara Grinstead 14 years ago.
Ryan Duke lost his attempt to have the state pay for his expert witnesses after he fired his public defender in favor of pro bono counsel from Atlanta.
Justice Charlie Bethel wrote for a unanimous court ruling that the justices have no authority in the matter because Tifton Judicial Circuit Chief Judge William Reinhardt II already said no to the funding request and no to a motion for a certificate of immediate review to go straight to the state Supreme Court. Duke's new lawyers—Ashleigh and John Merchant of the Merchant Law Firm in Marietta and John Gibbs III of Troutman Sanders in Atlanta—went to the court anyway.
“We were disappointed but not surprised by the court's decision,” Ashleigh Merchant said Tuesday. “We had hoped that criminal defendants would have the same right to appeal pretrial rulings that have a substantial effect on the constitutionality of the trial even when a trial court denies a certificate of immediate review. We hope that the legislature will decide to amend the statute so that criminal defendants will be given the same pretrial appeal rights that the state has. We believe that the Supreme Court clearly thinks this is an issue that should be determined, and we are committed to continue to fight to make sure that Mr. Duke is afforded a fair trial.”
In shutting down Duke's appeal, the high court overturned its own precedent from a 2000 decision in Waldrip v. Head. Waldrip held that the Supreme Court could bypass the law requiring the trial judge's agreement to an interlocutory appeal in cases that involve “an issue of great concern, gravity, and importance to the public.” For all other issues, appeals must wait until a case is decided in the trial court.
Bethel quoted from former Justice George Carley's dissent in Waldrip. Carley said the majority opinion “constitutes blatant judicial usurpation of the legislative function, and cannot be considered to be the legitimate exercise of inherent judicial authority.”
The decision was a victory for Tifton Judicial Circuit District Attorney C. Paul Bowden. He could not be reached immediately for comment.
And it was an affirmation of the trial judge's holding that, while Duke “has a constitutional right to be represented by private, pro bono counsel if he so chooses, he is not simultaneously constitutionally entitled to experts and investigators funded by the State.”
It was the second appearance before the high court for a murder that has yet to be tried. The justices already put a stop to another judge's gag order preventing everyone involved from talking about the trial.
The trial had been set to begin April 1 until the Supreme Court agreed a few days before to consider Duke's appeal over experts.
Duke was indicted in April 2017, charged with malice murder of the former Miss Tifton—plus felony murder, aggravated assault, burglary and concealing a death.
Grinstead vanished in 2005 after helping out at the Miss Georgia Sweet Potato Pageant and attending a cookout at the family home of a former school superintendent. She went back to her neat, white wood-frame house and was never seen again. Police came looking for her when she didn't show up at Irwin County High School the following Monday. They found the clothes she wore to the cookout but not her.
The case is Duke v. State, No. S19M0969.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All40% Contingency: A New Ruling Just Cost This Plaintiff Team $827K in Legal Fees
6 minute read'David and Goliath' Dispute Between Software Developers Ends in $24M Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 2U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 3From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 4How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
- 5'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250