After Visiting Ethiopian Airlines Crash Site, Beasley Allen Lawyer Sues Boeing
“The 346 lives that were sacrificed on the two doomed Boeing MAX flights will never return home, and they didn't have a chance to survive despite pilots' brave efforts,” said Mike Andrews of Beasley Allen. "They deserve justice by holding Boeing accountable.”
June 14, 2019 at 03:37 PM
4 minute read
The family of a passenger killed in the Ethiopian Airlines crash earlier this year, represented by the Beasley Allen Law Firm of Atlanta and Montgomery, Alabama, filed a lawsuit against the Boeing Co. Thursday alleging negligence over its 737 MAX aircraft.
“This action arises from the horrific crash of Ethiopian Airlines Flight302 (“Flight 302”) on March 10, 2019 in which 157 people lost their lives,” said the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division on behalf of Sara Yakob, the widow of Getnet Alemayehu, a passenger killed on that flight.
“The aircraft involved in Flight 302 was a Boeing 737 MAX 8,” the complaint said. “This crash came less than five months after Lion Air Flight JT 610—another Boeing 737 MAX 8—crashed into the Java Sea on October 29, 2018, killing all 189 on board.”
The complaint noted that investigation of both crashes continues. The 737 MAX has been grounded since the second crash.
“Boeing extends our heartfelt condolences and sympathies to the families and loved ones of those on board Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302,” corporate spokesman Peter Pedraza said Friday. “As the investigation continues, Boeing is cooperating fully with the investigating authorities.”
“We won't comment on this lawsuit directly,” Pedraza added.
“The similarities in the aircraft and the investigative findings for the crashes thus far point to a common cause,” the complaint said. “Shortly after taking off and while attempting to climb, pilots for both aircraft reported flight control issues as the planes pitched up and down erratically throughout the sky.”
The complaint said flight paths and data released thus far for both aircraft show that the “pilots were engaged in a terrifying tug-of-war with the plane's automated systems as the pilots manually tried to climb while the computer system repeatedly caused the plane to dive with increasing nose-down trim against the pilot inputs.”
The complaint said pilots of both planes “lost their fight with Boeing's flight computer, and hundreds of passengers and crew lost their lives due to Boeing's flight computer driving the airplanes into the ground.”
The family is represented by Beasley Allen's Mike Andrews, who focuses much of his practice on complex aviation litigation, along with Adam Ramji of the Ramji Law Group in Houston.
In preparing the lawsuit, members of the family's legal team traveled to Ethiopia, then rode several hours to the scene of the crash. Andrews described it as a 45-foot crater—large enough to hold a three-story building—in Tulu Fara village near Bishoftu, Ethiopia. He said only fragments of the plane remain, along with personal belongings of the passengers. He said the aircraft “throttled into the ground at nearly 600 miles per hour.” He said an armed guard escorted him to the site. He collected some of the aircraft's fragments for later inspection.
“Visiting the site of a crash was surreal,” Andrews said. “Seeing the personal items that had been carefully packed away for travel just weeks earlier lay strewn on the ground and mangled together with pieces from the aircraft was overwhelming — especially when we know this crash did not have to happen.”
The lawsuit alleged the company knew about the glitch and failed to fix it.
“The 346 lives that were sacrificed on the two doomed Boeing MAX flights will never return home, and they didn't have a chance to survive despite pilots' brave efforts,” Andrews said. “But Boeing had numerous chances to make the aircraft safer, and time and again it chose to protect its bottom line rather than the air travelers who trusted the company. They deserve justice by holding Boeing accountable.”
Beasley Allen is a plaintiffs firm with 80 attorneys and 200 support staff with reported verdicts and settlements in excess of $26 billion. The firm has handled litigation over defective General Motors ignition switches, Takata's exploding airbags, Gulf Coast states devastated by the BP oil spill, drugs and medical devices, Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder, predatory lending and VW emissions software.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCarrier Legal Chief Departs for GC Post at Defense Giant Lockheed Martin
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250