Former Legislator Can't Collect Legal Fees After Twice Overturning Primary Election
A Superior Court judge has ruled that former state legislator Dan Gasaway can't bill his opponent or the county election boards in his district for legal fees stemming from the judge's decision to throw out the election for the second time.
June 18, 2019 at 02:05 PM
3 minute read
Former state Rep. Dan Gasaway will have to foot the bulk of the bill for twice overturning a state Republican primary over improper voting, a Superior Court judge ruled Monday.
Senior Judge David Sweat rejected a request by Gasaway attorney Jake Evans to reimburse Gasaway for more than $100,000 in fees and costs associated with his second successful challenge of his 2018 Republican primary race against opponent Chris Erwin. Gasaway did not seek fees associated with his first successful challenge of the contest in a trial last year.
Erwin ultimately won the third election, which took place April 9, with more than 75 percent of the vote.
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said in February that his office has opened an investigation into voting irregularities in Habersham County that invalidated the first two contests.
But attorneys for Gasaway and Erwin said Sweat did order the respondents—which include Erwin and three county election boards in the contested legislative district—to reimburse Gasaway for costs other than legal fees he spent litigating the second case.
Gasaway originally sought more than $90,000 in fees and costs, an amount that increased to over $100,000 after Erwin appealed Sweat's decision to throw out the second election and order a third one. The appeal was dismissed after Erwin won.
Bryan Tyson, a partner with Atlanta's Taylor English Duma who defended Erwin, said Sweat decided Erwin based his defense on arguments that could be considered reasonable, rather than frivolous, although a Habersham County court overturned the first two elections over Erwin's objections.
Tyson said the judge held at the end of a hearing on Monday that Erwin's defense “was based on a reasonable interpretation of the statute that the court could have agreed with.” That finding, he said, “forecloses fees.”
“I hope it's done,” Tyson said of the multiple election challenges. “We're glad the chapter is finally closing on this primary over a year later.”
Evans, a senior litigation associate at the Atlanta offices of Holland & Knight and chairman of the state's Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission, said, “We're thankful the judge properly awarded costs to Mr. Gasaway, in part making him whole,”
He said. “It's been a great journey getting to today, and I think this case made real positive change.”
Sweat twice threw out the election results stemming from last year's Republican primary between Gasaway, a three-term state representative, and Irwin to represent House District 28, which includes parts of Banks, Stephens, and Habersham counties in northern Georgia. The first election was invalidated at trial after determining there were sufficient voter irregularities—including disenfranchised voters who were given the wrong ballots—to put the results in doubt. Gasaway lost the first race to Erwin by 67 votes.
In February, Sweat threw out the results of the Dec. 4 do-over race after finding four votes were cast illegally and stripped Erwin of his new legislative office. That's when Evans petitioned the court for legal fees, arguing that before the case went to trial, he had asked the county election boards to invalidate the second race based on evidence that at least four illegal votes were cast—enough to throw the second race to Gasaway.
Tyson branded the motion for legal fees as “sour grapes.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readFourth Circuit Seeks More Legal Briefs in Unresolved N.C. Supreme Court Election
4 minute readFulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Vedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
- 2Wells Fargo and Bank of America Agree to Pay Combined $60 Million to Settle SEC Probe
- 3Legaltech Rundown: Robin AI Releases In-house Tool, Epona Merges With JustiSolutions, and More
- 4As Lawmakers Eye Need for NY Supreme Court Posts, Could a Ballot Question Remove the Constitutional Limit?
- 5State Appellate Court Rejects Reasoning for Attorney's Removal From Conservatorship
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250