Former Legislator Can't Collect Legal Fees After Twice Overturning Primary Election
A Superior Court judge has ruled that former state legislator Dan Gasaway can't bill his opponent or the county election boards in his district for legal fees stemming from the judge's decision to throw out the election for the second time.
June 18, 2019 at 02:05 PM
3 minute read
Former state Rep. Dan Gasaway will have to foot the bulk of the bill for twice overturning a state Republican primary over improper voting, a Superior Court judge ruled Monday.
Senior Judge David Sweat rejected a request by Gasaway attorney Jake Evans to reimburse Gasaway for more than $100,000 in fees and costs associated with his second successful challenge of his 2018 Republican primary race against opponent Chris Erwin. Gasaway did not seek fees associated with his first successful challenge of the contest in a trial last year.
Erwin ultimately won the third election, which took place April 9, with more than 75 percent of the vote.
Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said in February that his office has opened an investigation into voting irregularities in Habersham County that invalidated the first two contests.
But attorneys for Gasaway and Erwin said Sweat did order the respondents—which include Erwin and three county election boards in the contested legislative district—to reimburse Gasaway for costs other than legal fees he spent litigating the second case.
Gasaway originally sought more than $90,000 in fees and costs, an amount that increased to over $100,000 after Erwin appealed Sweat's decision to throw out the second election and order a third one. The appeal was dismissed after Erwin won.
Bryan Tyson, a partner with Atlanta's Taylor English Duma who defended Erwin, said Sweat decided Erwin based his defense on arguments that could be considered reasonable, rather than frivolous, although a Habersham County court overturned the first two elections over Erwin's objections.
Tyson said the judge held at the end of a hearing on Monday that Erwin's defense “was based on a reasonable interpretation of the statute that the court could have agreed with.” That finding, he said, “forecloses fees.”
“I hope it's done,” Tyson said of the multiple election challenges. “We're glad the chapter is finally closing on this primary over a year later.”
Evans, a senior litigation associate at the Atlanta offices of Holland & Knight and chairman of the state's Government Transparency & Campaign Finance Commission, said, “We're thankful the judge properly awarded costs to Mr. Gasaway, in part making him whole,”
He said. “It's been a great journey getting to today, and I think this case made real positive change.”
Sweat twice threw out the election results stemming from last year's Republican primary between Gasaway, a three-term state representative, and Irwin to represent House District 28, which includes parts of Banks, Stephens, and Habersham counties in northern Georgia. The first election was invalidated at trial after determining there were sufficient voter irregularities—including disenfranchised voters who were given the wrong ballots—to put the results in doubt. Gasaway lost the first race to Erwin by 67 votes.
In February, Sweat threw out the results of the Dec. 4 do-over race after finding four votes were cast illegally and stripped Erwin of his new legislative office. That's when Evans petitioned the court for legal fees, arguing that before the case went to trial, he had asked the county election boards to invalidate the second race based on evidence that at least four illegal votes were cast—enough to throw the second race to Gasaway.
Tyson branded the motion for legal fees as “sour grapes.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250