Distinguished Leader: Judge Horace Johnson Jr.
Without the Parental Accountability Court, "these participants would have likely languished in and out of the county jail and certainly not have made real steps in becoming and staying consistent supporting parents."
June 19, 2019 at 02:00 PM
5 minute read
Judge Horace Johnson Jr. told Atlanta magazine in 2015, “The law is about inclusion. And inclusion is more than just words.”
Indeed, Johnson was one of a handful of children who integrated Newton County schools in the 1960s. He went on to graduate from Emory University and the University of Georgia Law School.
As he told the magazine, after three years in private practice in Atlanta, he noticed there were no black lawyers in Newton County, so he started a firm there. He practiced in Covington at Johnson & Freeman and served as a judge pro tem in the Newton County Juvenile Court.
When the Legislature created a fourth judgeship in the Alcovy Circuit, Gov. Roy Barnes tapped Johnson for the post, and voters have returned him to office in subsequent elections. He told the magazine that his role on the bench can be a powerful symbol for defendants: “If there's a person who looks like them, folks might feel like the system is open to them.”
He presides over a Parental Accountability Court, served as president of the Council of Superior Court Judges of Georgia, founded Newton Mentoring and serves on the Judicial Council of Georgia.
What is one of the most compelling memories of integrating Newton County Schools?
I was among five African American students who enrolled at Ficquett Elementary School at the beginning of the 1965-66 school year. I was a fourth-grader. While my parents, both educators, had numerous conversations with me about what I might expect in this new environment, the students were for the most part all very welcoming. My teachers, too, were all very polite.
I made some wonderful friendships at Ficquett, some that have lasted now for more than 50 years. These friendships are among the most lasting memories of the experience. In the fall of 1969, our community's main African American school, R.L. Cousins, was re-opened as a new fully-integrated junior high. Unfortunately, too many of the students at Ficquett, whom I counted as good friends, didn't make the transition to eighth grade at R.L. Cousins Junior High but instead attended new private schools, many of which opened their doors for the first time also that very fall.
While the experience overall was favorable based on my friends and teachers, I learned years later about the necessity and importance of parental involvement in your children's education. I recall that my parents were engaged in my education, but not overbearing so as to make my social experience awkward. They, however, actively monitored my progress to ensure that I was being academically challenged, and, if they thought anything was amiss, they did not hesitate to voice their opinions to teachers and administrators. They later shared that, during those early years, unspecified and unsubstantiated issues were raised that could have hindered my academic progress. Of course, my mother, who was a “tiger” mom before the phrase existed, was not having any of that.
What is one of your biggest challenges in presiding over a Parental Accountability Court?
Our Parental Accountability Court, is one of the four specialty court programs in the Alcovy Circuit. I was privileged to begin PAC first in Newton County in 2012, expanding to Walton County two years later. I also initiated a Veterans Treatment Court in the circuit in 2016.
Presiding over those specialty courts, in addition to my regular dockets, has been both rewarding and challenging. Working with a team that includes prosecutors, strong and consistent coordinators, volunteer counsel, treatment providers, prospective employers, along with various other community stakeholders, and, of course, the participants, has brought about some transformative experiences. The financial impact of the PAC program, coupled with rebuilt self-esteem, is enabling participants to stand tall and remain standing once the program ends for them. Over the history of PAC within my judicial circuit, participants have paid in excess of $215,000 on their respective child support cases. Without PAC, these participants would have likely languished in and out of the county jail and certainly not have made real steps in becoming and staying consistent supporting parents. Collaterally, several participants have had legitimation orders entered and some visitation matters addressed favorably through pro bono assistance afforded by the program.
Notwithstanding the program's success, there is an ongoing need to increase the list of prospective employers who will take a chance on persons with often checkered pasts. The programmatic structure yields stronger participant employees who are more productive in the long run and with less attrition.
Who was one of your mentors, and what did you learn from this person ?
I have been blessed to have had great mentors, both personally and professionally. Among them is for sure Justice Robert Benham of the Georgia Supreme Court. From his initial elevation to the bench, I cannot recall when he did not extend himself to nurture and encourage young lawyers and aspiring jurists. A genuinely humble man, he has always espoused adherence to fundamental principles that should be obvious but which are too often ignored to one's ultimate detriment. Preparation and tenacity are basic tenets. When coupled with a constant awareness that being a pioneer carries added responsibilities, there was a path to and through any road chosen. I will always be grateful for his living example as I seek to pass those lessons experienced on to that next generation forever in pursuit of justice for all.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute readQ&A: UGA Law School Dean Peter 'Bo' Rutledge on His Transition Back to Private Practice
5 minute readMorris Manning & Martin's First Chief Strategy Officer Eyes Marketing, Laterals for Growth
3 minute readHow I Made Partner: 'Begin to Build a Personal Brand,' Says Courtney Quiros of Alston & Bird
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250