GC Impact: Evan Glover
He credits his parents, who "encouraged me to constantly learn, to always find a new challenge, to get out of my comfort zone and grow."
June 19, 2019 at 02:00 PM
2 minute read
Evan Glover, law vice president and chief counsel for Atlanta-based NCR, added the role of chief privacy officer to his list of duties in 2018.
This responsibility for 700 million daily consumer transactions requires Glover to work with a team of about 50 privacy champions at NCR. He also is leading professionals across the globe in the rollout of a comprehensive privacy program for more than 200 software products operating in 180 countries.
Glover also joined the board of trustees at MedShare, an international humanitarian aid organization that sources and delivers surplus medical supplies and equipment to communities in need in 100 countries. Glover has sorted medical supplies on the front lines, an experience that led him to secure $150,000 from the NCR Foundation to support MedShare over the next three years.
As NCR's chief privacy officer, how is the war against privacy breaches going? Is this winnable, or will the fight be going on as long as society engages in digital transactions?
The global privacy landscape is evolving, constant innovation is the norm, and businesses are challenged to expand more rapidly. Legal and compliance professionals are uniquely positioned to help their clients understand—and mitigate—the risk involved in all this complexity.
Who was one of your mentors, and what did you learn from that person?
My mentors include my mother, Rose, and father, Bill—both of whom were educators and both of whom passed away after battles with brain cancer. They instilled in me to believe that our circumstance is not our destiny. They encouraged me to constantly learn, to always find a new challenge, to get out of my comfort zone and grow.
What is a misconception lawyers have about the role of in-house counsel?
We are not only lawyers—we often wear a few other hats. In a given day, we may advise on a significant business transaction, we may mitigate risk for a strategic initiative, we may proactively manage a dispute, we may help the business comply with a standard, and we may mentor a colleague.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQ&A: UGA Law School Dean Peter 'Bo' Rutledge on His Transition Back to Private Practice
5 minute readMorris Manning & Martin's First Chief Strategy Officer Eyes Marketing, Laterals for Growth
3 minute readHow I Made Partner: 'Begin to Build a Personal Brand,' Says Courtney Quiros of Alston & Bird
As Law Firms Embrace AI, Will Dedicated Executive Roles Give Them An Edge?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250