On the Rise: Kacy Goebel
"Pro bono is an opportunity to dust off legal skills I don't use every day. It's also a great way to partner with outside counsel while giving back to the Atlanta community."
June 19, 2019 at 02:00 PM
2 minute read
Job Title: Senior corporate counsel.
Current primary practice area: Commercial litigation, with a focus on class actions, antitrust recovery, real estate and construction litigation and Canadian litigation.
Experience: The Home Depot, 2015-present; Jones Day, 2006-2015.
Education: University of Notre Dame Law School, 2006; University of South Carolina, 2002.
What drew you to a career in law? In college, I double majored in political science and Spanish. I was interested in being an FBI agent, and two of the specializations that help getting that job are foreign language skills and a law degree. Fortunately for all of us, I didn't end up being an FBI agent, so here I am working as a commercial litigator.
Have you set a specific goal that you want to achieve in the next year? The Home Depot has a robust pro bono practice, and I'd like to take on more projects this year. Pro bono is an opportunity to dust off legal skills I don't use every day. It's also a great way to partner with outside counsel while giving back to the Atlanta community.
What has been your proudest career moment and biggest challenge? Three years ago, we began challenging precedent that was preventing removal of certain class actions to federal court. That effort culminated in a U.S. Supreme Court argument by my practice group leader this January. Being hands-on in that process and sitting at counsel's table for the argument was surreal.
Differently, but no less significant, in 2011 I was a fellow at Atlanta Legal Aid. For four months, I primarily represented people fighting wrongful evictions and secured domestic violence protective orders. It was the hardest, most humbling work I've ever done and the period in my career of which I'm most proud.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQ&A: UGA Law School Dean Peter 'Bo' Rutledge on His Transition Back to Private Practice
5 minute readMorris Manning & Martin's First Chief Strategy Officer Eyes Marketing, Laterals for Growth
3 minute readHow I Made Partner: 'Begin to Build a Personal Brand,' Says Courtney Quiros of Alston & Bird
As Law Firms Embrace AI, Will Dedicated Executive Roles Give Them An Edge?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250