On the Rise: Matthew Joe
As a third-year associate in 2010, his firm closed its Atlanta real estate practice … except for him.
June 19, 2019 at 02:00 PM
3 minute read
Job Title: Partner.
Current primary practice area: Commercial real estate.
Experience: Holland & Knight, 2007-present.
Education: University of Georgia School of Law, 2007; University of Georgia, 2004.
What drew you to a career in law? I've always been oriented toward thinking like a lawyer. In middle school, I participated in mock trial workshops and “day in the life of an attorney” programs. In high school, I was on the debate team and clerked in a law library. My interest in law really took off when I realized that transactional real estate attorneys combine skills that seem to come naturally to me with business transactions that are exciting, complicated and, hopefully, profitable. I love being a trusted counselor to my clients and a critical part of helping them bring their real estate deals to life.
Have you set a specific goal that you want to achieve in the next year?
I've been trying to delegate significantly more work to our associates than in prior years. This is difficult for me, because I am particular about how I do things, and I like to control my entire practice. But for years I have had more work to do than time to do it, and so leveraging my practice is the natural and necessary next step in my career. We have several amazing associates at my firm who support my practice. They make it much easier for me to loosen my grip and trust that the work will be done right.
What has been your proudest career moment and your biggest hurdle?
In 2010, my firm made the difficult financial decision to shut down the Atlanta real estate group … except me, then a third-year associate. I was an “associate free agent” until 2015, when we again began hiring real estate attorneys in Atlanta (we now have a robust group). This career path is quite different from the prototypical big firm model in which partners take specific associates under their wings. Lucky for me, during that time, I forged strong relationships with, and learned how to practice law from, our 250-plus real estate attorneys throughout the country and the cross-discipline attorneys in Atlanta.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readJudge Orders Stop to Referendum in Coastal Ga. Slave Descendants' Zoning Battle
5 minute readBitter Fight Between 2 Tribes Over Sacred Land Where One Built a Casino
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250