Atlanta Judge's 'Chronic Tardiness' Allegedly Led to Illegal Detentions
Georgia's Judicial Qualifications Commission has filed formal ethics charges against Atlanta Municipal Court Judge Terrinee Gundy.
June 20, 2019 at 02:35 PM
3 minute read
Multiple defendants assigned to Atlanta Municipal Court Judge Terrinee Gundy's docket were illegally jailed until public defenders sued for their release because of Gundy's alleged failure to act on their cases, according to Georgia's judicial watchdog.
The allegedly illegal detentions stemmed from what the state Judicial Qualifications Commission said was Gundy's chronic tardiness. On Wednesday, the JQC's investigative panel filed formal ethics charges against Gundy, contending the judge has for years repeatedly breached the state Code of Judicial Conduct.
On a single day in 2017, Gundy's absence deprived six defendants of constitutionally required hearings that eventually required the city public defender's office to file a habeas petition in Fulton County Superior Court to secure their release on signature bonds, according to the JQC and the petition.
Gundy's alleged failure to hold hearings for misdemeanor defendants was “an abandonment of her duties … to the detriment of jailed detainees” that potentially violated two ethics canons and multiple rules governing the state's judiciary, according to the charges.
The judge is also accused of behaving “in a manner unbecoming to a judicial officer” by allegedly mistreating defendants and colleagues and “by improperly using her judicial position to advance her personal interests.”
Gundy's attorney, Frank Strickland of Taylor English Duma, declined to comment on the misconduct allegations. Gundy, who was appointed to the bench by former Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed in 2013, has 30 days to file a response to the charges.
The municipal court's Chief Judge Christopher Portis couldn't be reached for comment.
Other charges against Gundy contained in the JQC complaint—which is on file at the Supreme Court of Georgia—contend the judge repeatedly breached the judicial ethics code in other “multiple different and distinct ways” and then lied about it when questioned by JQC commissioners and their staff.
They include:
- Failing to “fairly, promptly and efficiently dispose of the business of the court” due to a “willful and persistent pattern of absenteeism”
- An alleged “persistent” failure to arrive at the courthouse until after proceedings in her courtroom were scheduled to begin.
- Ordering that courtroom audio-video systems be disconnected or disabled while she was on the bench, allegedly to conceal excessive tardiness.
- Ordering the municipal court operations manager to stop producing and distributing “case count” calendars and other official documents that could have revealed Gundy's alleged “pattern of improper absenteeism.”
- Allegedly threatening to terminate a court security officer if he failed to secure seats for herself and her family to the 2018 inauguration of Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms.
- Allegedly using court resources unrelated to court business for her own and others' personal benefit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPanel to Decide if Governor Should Suspend Georgia Lawyer From Elected Post
4 minute readPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250