Woman Rear-Ended by Pickup Settles Spinal Injury Claims for $3M
There was also a pending motion for spoliation sanctions because the brakes of a truck involved in the wreck were repaired afterward.
June 27, 2019 at 01:59 PM
5 minute read
A woman whose back was injured when she was rear-ended by a pickup truck as she waited at a red light reached a $3 million combined settlement against the other driver and his employer, and a garage that worked on the truck's brakes prior to the crash.
The case was complicated by a number of factors, including that the plaintiff—now 72—had several falls before and after the wreck, and she was in another wreck two years after being hit. There was also a pending motion for spoliation sanctions because the truck's brakes were repaired after the wreck and the old parts discarded, said plaintiff's attorney Ben Brodhead.
“I honestly think we could have gotten $10 million at trial, but my client just wasn't looking forward to going through three more years of appeals,” said Brodhead, who handled the case with Brodhead Law colleague Ashley Fournet.
The insurer for the at-fault driver and his employer, Annasteel & Supply Co., will pay $2.8 million of the settlement. Their attorney, Andrew M. Capobianco of Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins, declined to comment.
The other $200,000 was paid by the insurer for the garage that worked on the truck, Clayton Auto Service, which was represented by Neal Scott with Zurich North America Insurance's in-house counsel, the Law Office of Terry-Dawn Thomas.
Scott said he could not comment “other than to say Clayton Auto's contribution was a small percentage of the total settlement amount.”
According to Brodhead and court filings, Sandra King's Toyota Avalon was stopped at a traffic signal in DeKalb County in June 2014 when a Ford F-250 pickup driven by Michael Brown rear-ended her.
According to a witness, there was smoke coming from the truck's wheels and the “distinct odor of burning brakes” just before the collision.
A photo of King's car shows the left rear third of the vehicle completely crushed, and Brodhead said the truck ran up onto and over the car's rear bumper.
“This was a huge impact,” he said. “The defense claimed that, since the truck went over the structure of the vehicle, that the collision wasn't as bad as it appeared. There might be some truth to that, but the truck completely overran the back bumper.”
Rather than go to an emergency room for treatment, King had her husband take her.
Then 67, King's initial complaints were of pain in the hip and knee, but she soon began experiencing lower back pain, Brodhead said. She underwent lumbar fusion surgery more than a year later.
Brown “had a series of falls both before and after the collision” and in 2016 was involved in a “significant, roll-over collision that required transport to the hospital by ambulance,” he said.
She denied that her back was further injured in that wreck, and the following year she had to undergo another surgery because the initial fusion failed.
Brown said after the wreck that his brakes failed and that the brake pedal did not move when he pressed it, Brodhead said. Brown was cited for following too closely.
Annasteel had allowed Brown to drive the truck to and from work, and Clayton had worked on its brakes at least twice before the wreck.
After the wreck, Annasteel once again had Clayton work on the truck, including replacing the brakes.
“In reality, that truck was probably totaled based on the value of the truck,” said Brodhead. “Why repair a 1991 pickup with hundreds of thousands of miles on it? That's why we argued it looked like intentional spoliation of evidence.”
King sued Annasteel, Brown and Clayton in DeKalb County State Court in 2016.
Brodhead said the positions of the Annasteel defendants could have complicated a trial.
“Annasteel paid Brown's ticket, so that counts as a bond forfeiture and guilty plea, legally,” he said.
“Annasteel also claimed he was not in the scope and course of his employment at the time, so they were not at fault. They also seemed to have a contradiction, because they were saying that, even if the brakes failed, he should have been able to stop.”
The garage, he said, denied any negligence, but without the missing brake parts there was no way to prove how or whether they actually failed.
Brodhead filed a motion for spoliation sanctions in May, and it was still pending when Judge Al Wong, who was handling the case, convened a mediation.
The mediation failed, but “Judge Wong's help laid the groundwork for the settlement,” he said.
The case was on Wong's July trial calendar when the consent order ending it was entered June 11.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
'Stock Car Monopoly'?: Winston Lawsuit Alleges NASCAR Anticompetitive Scheme
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New Acquitted Conduct Guideline: An Analysis
- 2Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 32024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 4What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 5Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250