Johnson Departs Knight Johnson to Start Trial Law Firm
James Johnson is venturing out from the real estate and business litigation boutique he co-founded with Bryan Knight eight years ago to try something new.
June 28, 2019 at 11:03 AM
4 minute read
James Johnson is venturing out from Knight Johnson, the business litigation boutique he co-founded with Bryan Knight eight years ago, to launch his own trial law firm.
Both said the split is amicable. “It was time for me to tackle something new, and I like trying cases,” said Johnson, who is developing a more trial-oriented practice focused on personal injury and white-collar defense.
Knight will continue to represent developers, builders, hotel and business owners in disputes. “We are still friends and we'll refer business to each other,” he said.
Knight and Johnson started Knight Johnson in 2011 to handle real estate, business and construction litigation. “We started out just the two of us, with no staff and licking our own stamps,” Knight said.
Since then the firm has added three lawyers, Sherri Buda, Scott McAlpine and Nick Sears, paralegal Laura Heppolette and staff. All are staying with Knight, who has renamed his firm Knight Law.
Knight will keep their office space in Midtown at 1360 Peachtree St. N.E., while Johnson has established Johnson Trial Law in Decatur at 150 E. Ponce de Leon Ave.—just a three-minute commute from his house, he said.
Knight and Johnson, both 41, met as opposing counsel on cases over residential real estate developments adjacent to Atlantic Station. Knight was at Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, which was representing homebuilder Beezer Homes, and Johnson was at Morris, Manning & Martin, whose client was the developer.
“We were the lowly associates working late nights,” Knight said.
Both subsequently worked together as associates at litigation firm Bloom Parham for a short period and then decided to start their own shop. They've won a few multimillion dollar verdicts along the way. “We've been far more successful than I would have thought, sitting there licking stamps eight years ago,” Knight said.
They tried the very first case heard by the newly formed Fulton County Business Court in 2012, Johnson said, winning a $1 million jury verdict for a developer against a bank.
And in 2015 Johnson, Knight and Buda scored a big win, a $7.1 million jury verdict in a case they tried for an investor, RM Kids, over a real estate dispute. A Gwinnett County jury decided that a title insurance company owed the $7.1 million for the diminished value of a 151-acre parcel of land slated for a subdivision near Sugarloaf Parkway in Gwinnett. The land could no longer be used for a subdivision, the investor discovered after purchase, because it was contaminated in the 1990s by an oil spill, but the title insurer refused to cover the defect in the title.
The title insurer successfully appealed the verdict, and Knight and Buda retried the case last year, winning a $4.2 million verdict that time.
The Daily Report has named both Knight and Johnson as “On the Rise” lawyers under 40.
Johnson said he's taking on some high-stakes personal injury cases and white-collar criminal defense cases at Johnson Trial Law. “I have a tendency of taking on cases that I find personally interesting,” he said.
Those have included defending an investment group accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission of perpetrating a $70 million Ponzi scheme; another client accused of defrauding a sperm bank; and another who was one of the subjects of a grand jury investigation into a “scam PAC,” the term for political action committees that purport to raise funds to support a political candidate or cause, only to spend it on themselves.
Johnson is currently working on two personal injury cases in California, where he also practices: a sexual assault case for a woman whom he said was repeatedly molested over several years by a tennis coach and another for an NFL player who did not receive the necessary emergency care after a “gruesome hand injury” on the field, which caused him career problems.
“My cases are not nearly as sexy as some of those,” Knight said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalking a Minute in Your Adversary’s Shoes: Addressing the Issue of 'Naive Realism' at Mediation
5 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250