'Legally Flawed'? 'Clear Signal' to Leaders? Here's What's Been Said About the Georgia Abortion Lawsuit
“We look forward to seeing Gov. Kemp in Court,” SisterSong Executive Director Monica Simpson said. “As a reproductive justice organization based in Georgia for over 20 years, SisterSong is committed to centering and amplifying the needs of those communities historically pushed to the margins."
June 28, 2019 at 04:14 PM
6 minute read
Proponents of the Georgia House Bill 481 abortion ban effectively got what they wanted Friday: a lawsuit that could be the first step toward asking the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit its landmark decision in Roe v. Wade.
SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective and a long list of others sued Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, Attorney General Chris Carr and prosecutors around the state in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Friday seeking to block enforcement of the law, signed in May and set to take effect Jan. 1.
While state officials didn’t comment Friday, a vocal supporter of the ban, Family Policy Alliance of Georgia Executive Director Cole Muzio, spoke out on behalf of those who backed it.
“We are certainly not surprised by this legally flawed lawsuit, but it is nonetheless chilling to see further confirmation that the abortion industry cares far more for profit than human life,” Muzio said in a news release.
“We are so grateful to Gov. Kemp for his unwavering commitment on behalf of the most vulnerable among us, and we support him as he continues to fight for life in court. Our hope is that the judicial system will end an era of tyranny and allow our state to protect its citizens, and our commitment is to keep waging the political and policy fight to ensure a Georgia where all life—regardless of location, stage of development, ability to speak, or connection to power—is cherished,” Muzio added.
The governor and the AG both declined to comment on Friday. The bill’s lead sponsor—state Rep. Ed Setzler, R-Acworth—said he preferred not to discuss the bill or the lawsuit on the record. But he sent a comment in a text.
“With science, law, and common sense on our side, I believe that all human beings with a beating heart will soon be recognized as persons here in Georgia,” Setzler said. “After the Supreme Court’s experiment of allowing so-called doctors to kill 62 million helpless children since 1973, ordinary Americans from the Gulf of Mexico to the Canadian border are demanding that the killing finally stop.”
State Sen. Renee Unterman, R-Buford, who carried the bill through the Senate, said Friday she couldn’t talk about it.
Opponents of the ban had plenty to say Friday. They gathered outside the Richard B. Russell Federal Building with demonstrators and signs saying “Stop. The. Bans.” Their signs referred to similar bans passed by a dozen states and restrictions in others, all working their way through stages of litigation.
“We look forward to seeing Gov. Kemp in Court,” SisterSong Executive Director Monica Simpson said to a bank of cameras and reporters. “As a reproductive justice organization based in Georgia for over 20 years, SisterSong is committed to centering and amplifying the needs of those communities historically pushed to the margins. Georgia’s maternal mortality rate is the second highest in the nation, and black women in our state are dying six times the national average. SisterSong is bringing this lawsuit to protect maternal health and reproductive rights so that every person—especially persons of color—can thrive in their families and communities as well as maintain their human right to make their own decisions about their reproductive lives.”
The other plaintiffs include Feminist Women’s Health Center of DeKalb County, Planned Parenthood Southeast, other medical facilities around the state, as well as physicians and staff suing on behalf of themselves and their patients.
Feminist Women’s Health Center Executive Director Kwajelyn J. Jackson also spoke outside the federal courthouse, saying her organization has been providing comprehensive reproductive health services, including abortion care, since 1976.
“We are challenging this unconstitutional law because we are committed to serving our patients and to a vision of Georgia where reproductive justice is fully realized for everyone,” she said. “This clinic stays open.”
Planned Parenthood Southeast CEO Staci Fox said the opposition to HB 481 was “like we’ve never seen before.”
“As an abortion provider, a reproductive rights advocate and a litigator, Planned Parenthood vowed to fight this dangerous ban every step of the way,” Fox said. “Today we take that next step. By filing this lawsuit, we are defending the rights of our patients and we are lifting up the voices of countless Georgians who were ignored this legislative session. Abortion is still safe, legal and available in Georgia, and we plan to keep it that way.”
The plaintiffs are being represented by lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union in Atlanta and New York and with Planned Parenthood in Washington and New York. ACLU Georgia Executive Director Andrea Young and Legal Director Sean J. Young stood with their clients in front of the federal courthouse Friday.
“Politicians have no place in these personal decisions,” Andrea Young said.
“This legislation is blatantly unconstitutional under nearly 50 years of U.S. Supreme Court precedent,” Young said.
The complaint seeks an injunction to block enforcement of the law, as well as legal fees for fighting it.
Laura Simmons, Georgia state director of abortion-rights group NARAL, released a statement supporting those who filed the lawsuit.
“When Governor Kemp and his allies forced their extreme ideology on Georgia women and families, we told them loud and clear: You won’t get away with it,” Simmons said. “The ACLU’s lawsuit sends a clear signal that Georgians will hold politicians accountable for their all-out assault on the reproductive health and safety of Georgia women.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readBass Berry & Sims Relocates to Nashville Office Designed to Encourage Collaboration, Inclusion
4 minute readGunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250