GSU's International Arbitration Center Expands Scope
The Atlanta Center for International Arbitration and Mediation has added domestic arbitrations and mediations to its purview and has changed its name.
July 01, 2019 at 02:22 PM
3 minute read
The international arbitration center housed at Georgia State University's law school has expanded its scope to handle domestic arbitrations and mediations for business disputes.
With the changes, the center has updated its name, effective July 1. Previously called the Atlanta Center for International Arbitration and Mediation since its launch in 2015, it's been redubbed the Georgia State University Law Center for Arbitration and Mediation.
A partnership between GSU College of Law and the Atlanta International Arbitration Society (ATLAS), the center's state-of-the-art hearing facility opened almost four years ago in GSU Law's new building in downtown Atlanta. ATLAS itself was founded in 2012 by a group of local lawyers to further Atlanta's bid to become a hub for international arbitrations.
The center has expanded into domestic arbitrations to take advantage of “demand we wanted to tap into locally and the fact that we are right here in downtown Atlanta,” said Nick Fomin, GSU Law's director of conference and event services
“We are building on the work that the arbitration center has already done to establish itself in the international market,” Fomin said. “We look forward to being a resource for the community.”
The name change is to take advantage of GSU Law's name-recognition in the local market and to reflect that GSU Law is now handling day-to-day logistics and event planning for the center, Fomin said. That allows it to take advantage of GSU Law's existing infrastructure, which includes a conference center.
It will continue to be a hearing space for international arbitrations and mediations and to host related conferences and educational events, he added.
The center will continue to collaborate with ATLAS and will honor all the memoranda of understanding agreements it has developed with a number of international arbitral institutions to collaborate on training and related activities. Those groups include the International Centre for Dispute Resolution, the ICC Court of International Arbitration, JAMS and the Vienna International Arbitration Centre.
Parties booking space at the GSU Law Center for Arbitration and Mediation through those institutions and ATLAS members also receive a 40% discount.
If a cross-border business contract has an arbitration clause, it typically specifies an arbitral location.
GSU Law's center has state-of-the art technology and concierge services for lawyers making the trip to Atlanta for their arbitrations and mediations. That includes airport transportation, hotel and restaurant reservations. It also can supply court reporters, interpreters and translators.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readHusch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250