Macon DA Wants to Ban Gambling Machines
“It's not uncommon to see children standing in local convenience stores while their parents gamble away money meant for groceries and rent,” Macon DA Cooke said. “By design, many of the stores who have these machines are located in our most impoverished neighborhoods that already are challenged by blight and crime.”
July 08, 2019 at 05:33 PM
3 minute read
Macon Judicial Circuit District Attorney David Cooke issued a call Monday for a statewide ban on commercial gambling machines, saying they exacerbate crime, poverty and family suffering.
“As DA, there's a lot I can do once we have sued or indicted individual store and machine owners who have violated the law. And I intend to use all the tools I have available to hold those who violate the law accountable,” Cooke said during a news conference. “But this problem will not go away until the legislature acts to ban these machines that are wreaking havoc in our communities.”
Cooke said Georgians play billions of dollars on the machines each year. Game play in Middle Georgia is estimated to be in the hundreds of millions. When operated legally, video gambling machine players can redeem their winnings for store credit or lottery tickets. Although cash payouts are prohibited, law enforcement investigations have shown that most stores operating the machines pay customers in cash, Cooke said. As a result, gambling addiction and abuse is a widespread problem, he said.
“It's not uncommon to see children standing in local convenience stores while their parents gamble away money meant for groceries and rent,” Cooke said. “By design, many of the stores who have these machines are located in our most impoverished neighborhoods that already are challenged by blight and crime.”
Cooke said psychologists have said video gambling machines are far more addictive than other forms of gambling because they provide immediate reinforcement through player wins in the short term as an inducement to keep them playing.
Last month, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed gambling convictions of a 74-year-old restaurant owner whose family was forced into bankruptcy after Cooke prosecuted him over the operation of nine coin-operated game machines.
Ronnie Bartlett, owner of the now-defunct Captain Jack's Crab Shack in Peach County, was one of a string of defendants Cooke charged with gambling offenses. Bartlett's attorney, Chris Anulewicz, said his client was the first who chose to fight rather then enter a plea.
Anulewicz and former Georgia Attorney General Mike Bowers, who also represents Bartlett, contend that the appellate court's June 25 reversal is the first step in calling a halt to what they say is a pattern of similar, lucrative—and potentially abusive—prosecutions across the state for nearly two decades by local prosecutors.
Cooke is a career prosecutor who was first elected district attorney in 2012. He spoke out recently on a different issue: the abortion ban passed by the Georgia General Assembly and signed by Gov. Brian Kemp this year. The ban has raised questions about potential criminal liability for women who seek abortions because it fails to provide them with a potential defense in prosecution in cases of rape or if the woman's life is in danger. “My office will continue its long-standing practice of supporting and protecting women who are in crisis, rather than prosecuting them,” Cooke said about the abortion ban. “I will exercise my discretion not to prosecute women and doctors for exercising their constitutional rights.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readAppeals Court Removes Fulton DA From Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Others
6 minute readFamily of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
5 minute readFulton Judge Rejects Attempt by Trump Campaign Lawyer to Invalidate Guilty Plea in Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250