15 of the 60 Best Law Firms for Women Have Atlanta Offices
The percentage of women equity partners increased to 23%, up three percentage points from last year, for firms participating in Working Mother magazine's annual survey.
July 18, 2019 at 05:55 PM
4 minute read
Fifteen of this year's 60 Best Law Firms for Women chosen by Working Mother magazine have an Atlanta office—up from 10 last year.
Working Mother evaluated the firms, which averaged 661 lawyers, based on the percentage of women equity partners and women in leadership, career-advancement initiatives and family-friendly policies.
The magazine expanded the list from 50 firms last year. The firms self-select to apply and fill out a 300-question survey.
This year the 60 firms on the list reported an average of 22% women among their equity partners. That's up from an average of 20% in last year's Working Mother report—and an improvement over the average of 16% in 2007, the first year of the survey.
Of the 15 firms with Atlanta offices, virtual firm Culhane Meadows Haughian & Walsh reported that 60% of its equity partners are women—the highest percentage by far of the 60 firms on the list. The high percentage is due to the fact that Culhane Meadows only has five equity partners—of whom three are women. It is also the second-smallest firm on the list with only 62 lawyers.
The percentage of women equity partners at the other 14 firms in Atlanta ranged from 30% at Constangy and Littler Mendelson, to 15% at Baker & Hostetler. Ranked by that percentage, they are as follows:
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete (30%), Littler (30%), Jackson Lewis (28%), Ballard Spahr (25%), Shook, Hardy & Bacon (25%), Squire Patton Boggs (24%), Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner (23%), DLA Piper (21%), Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart (21%), Seyfarth Shaw (21%), Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz (20%), Dentons (19%), Fish & Richardson (17%) and Baker & Hostetler (15%).
Unsurprisingly, the firms with some of the highest percentages of women equity partners, Constangy, Littler and Jackson Lewis, are labor and employment firms, which generally have higher proportions of women lawyers and lawyers of color.
Ballard Spahr, a Philadelphia-based general practice firm, is still a single-tier partnership, where all partners have equity in the firm.
This year, the 60 firms on the Working Mother list reported an average of 38% women lawyers overall and 30% women nonequity partners. Last year's 50 firms also averaged 30% nonequity partners.
While the overall percentage of women equity partners is inching up at a slow pace, firms on the list report that they are promoting a higher percentage of women to partner and to equity partner.
Constangy reported that women made up 60% of its internal partner promotions–both equity and nonequity—over the past five years.
At Baker Donelson, last year's new shareholder class was more than half female for the fourth year in a row, the firm said, and almost half of the new shareholders used its parental leave program.
In their survey submissions to Working Mother, the firms in Atlanta reported a variety of efforts to promote the advancement of women lawyers. Common themes were increasing the number of women in leadership, launching business development programs focused on women and offering flex-time and generous parental leave.
DLA Piper reported one of the more unique initiatives. Its practice group leaders have started comparing the average billable hours logged by diverse lawyers, versus nondiverse lawyers, for the firm's 50 highest revenue clients to check for inequities that it can resolve.
While women account for on average only 30% of firm leaders for the 60 firms on the list, at Constangy, women make up half the firm's practice and office leaders and half its governance committee.
In another sign of progress, Seyfarth Shaw said that half of its newly appointed national department chairs and newly elected executive committee members are women. The office managing partners for its three largest offices, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York, are also women. (The firm has offices in 16 cities.)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
- 2Musk Avoids Sanctions for Skipping SEC Testimony for Rocket Launch
- 3On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves to End Trump Prosecution
- 4Stars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
- 5Elaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250