Preparing Your Client for a Productive Domestic Mediation
Managing expectations is important to the success of mediation.
August 05, 2019 at 01:57 PM
5 minute read
Domestic mediations should be contemplated as a helpful vehicle to resolve temporary issues and/or to reach full divorce and child custody agreements. A skilled mediator who specializes in family law matters can help to resolve almost any case, provided you do your critical part in advance and during the mediation to prepare your client and provide the mediator with pertinent information regarding custody, finances and property division.
The Scenario
Congratulations! Well, maybe. You have recently been hired by a new client who is raring to go to war with their spouse. They were referred to you by a former client who spoke very highly of you. Yes, you are flattered and anxious to keep the referral tree fertilized with great results for clients.
After engaging in a lengthy initial discussion with the client—your paralegal could barely keep up with the client’s rapid-fire delivery of anecdotes, expletives, demands and tips for catching the client’s spouse in the act—you finally get a word in as you proceed to educate the client about the divorce process. You briefly mention that somewhere along the way, mediation may be ordered by the court or suggested by you or opposing counsel. The confused look spreading across your client’s face signals the typical misunderstanding among parties when alternative dispute resolution is mentioned.
“Meditation? Why would we do that?”
In response, your paralegal starts to offer the client one of your glossy “FAQs About Family Transitions” trifolds, which contains a brief section about domestic mediations, arbitration and judicially hosted settlement conferences, but you shake your head and proceed to explain the mechanics, benefits and pitfalls of a mediation to the client.
The Strategy
Be prepared and be intentional. When you complete premediation questionnaires provided by the mediator, the information can very helpful for the neutral in identifying the important issues for your client and where they may be emotionally in terms of the stages of divorce. Bring your Domestic Relations Financial Affidavit, valuations/appraisals, up-to-date account statements and other key financial documents with you to the mediation, and make sure your financial expert, if you have retained one, is available should any economic questions arise during the session. Be prepared to discuss any custodial reports or evaluations conducted in the case, and have child support worksheets and parenting plans available on your mobile device or laptop. Come prepared for a work session.
Talk in advance with your client about a practical, feasible custodial arrangement based on everyone’s daily schedules. All of this information must be disclosed and dealt with directly in order for the mediation to proceed in good faith. The mediator will need to see all financial details in order to help the parties reach enforceable agreements regarding financial support and equitable division of property. Be sure you and your client are in agreement on these matters before you show up for mediation.
Prepare your client for each step of the mediation. You have participated in several mediations, but your client most likely has not. Television court shows tend to emphasize courtroom drama; there likely won’t be any of that in a mediation. You know the drill, so share it with your client. The mediator may ask each party to make a brief opening statement. Explain caucusing, in which the mediator will meet with each side separately to build trust, gather information, frame and clarify issues, structure proposals and refocus your client on productive dialogue and positive results. This is your chance to speak in confidence. Please discourage your client from using the mediation as a venting session or pity party. With your permission, the mediator will share information with the other side. However, it is not appropriate to use the mediator as the carrier pigeon to dump any dirt your side has dredged up on your client’s spouse.
Managing expectations is important to the success of mediation. Showing up to the mediation ready and willing to participate is important. Make sure your client fully understands the stages of litigation. Often, a client will hold out for their day in court, believing that justice will descend from the heavens but only on their side of the courtroom because they are on the right side of the issues. When impasse threatens, the mediator will point out each step of “heading to court” and the mental and financial cost of doing so. This probably should not be the first time the client receives a reality check.
Each mediation will be as unique as your client and the specific circumstances of the case, despite some of the common features and nuances described above. Divorce and custody disputes are inherently stressful. To avoid the adversarial nature of litigation and the fear of the unknown that is inherent when a judge or jury of 12 strangers will decide your fate, domestic mediation can be just the remedy. When the parties are well prepared for mediation, their counsel and the mediator can effectively create the road map to life after divorce. Congratulations on committing to give mediation your best shot.
Retired Judge Gail S. Tusan served as chief judge of the Atlanta Judicial Circuit and presided for several years in the Family Division of Fulton County Superior Court. She serves as a mediator/arbitrator/special master with JAMS.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Trial Court's Sidestep of 'Batson' Deprived Defendant of Challenge to Jury Discrimination
- 2Is Your Law Firm Growing Fast Enough? Scale, Consolidation and Competition
- 3Child Custody: The Dangers of 'Rules of Thumb'
- 4The Spectacle of Rudy Giuliani Returns to the SDNY
- 5Orrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250