In-House Lawyer at Tech Company Taps Don Samuel for Fatal Traffic Charges Defense
Bryan K. Schmitt, associate corporate counsel and director of contracts at supply chain and technology company Manhattan Associates, remains in the Fulton County jail on murder, felony murder and aggravated assault charges.
August 14, 2019 at 06:31 PM
4 minute read
A local in-house attorney arrested for murder in connection with what police called a “quickly escalating” fatal traffic encounter has hired veteran criminal defense lawyer Donald Samuel, who described the charges as “disgraceful.”
After turning himself in Monday, Bryan K. Schmitt of Sandy Springs waived his first court appearance Tuesday on charges of murder, felony murder and aggravated assault, and bail was denied, according to Fulton County jail records. The allegations against Schmitt, associate corporate counsel and director of contracts at supply chain and technology company Manhattan Associates, stem from a July 30 traffic incident that resulted in the death of Hamid Jahangard, Sandy Springs police said.
A confrontation around 6 p.m. in a neighborhood in the 300 block of River Valley Road in Sandy Springs between Schmitt, who was in his Mercedes sedan, and Jahangard, who was standing outside a home in the area, “escalated to the point that Mr. Jahangard was struck by Schmitt’s vehicle,” Sandy Springs Police spokesman Sgt. Sam Worsham said. The sergeant added Jahangard was removed from life support and died at a hospital three days later.
Schmitt remained at the scene after the incident and “worked well with us, was cooperative” during that time, Worsham said. But witness statements taken during the ensuing investigation “made it appear that it was an intentional act, not just an accident,” he added.
Samuel, while conceding that he does not yet know for sure what exactly occurred, painted a different picture of the incident. Samuel, of Garland, Samuel & Loeb, is most recently well-known for his high-profile defense, along with Bruce Harvey, of prominent Atlanta lawyer Claud “Tex” McIver over the 2016 fatal shooting of his wife inside his vehicle.
According to Samuel, his client was driving his sedan down the residential street when he sensed that Jahangard, standing on the sidewalk, threw a golf ball or some other projectile at his vehicle. Samuel said Schmitt then drove down the street the length of a house or two and made a U-turn so he could return to where Jahangard was standing and ask about the object. As Schmitt made a left-hand turn into that driveway from a stopped position, the victim was moving from the side of the driveway into the path of the vehicle, perhaps using a garbage can to block Schmitt’s entry, said Samuel. He added there is no evidence—and two video recordings fail to reveal—that the car actually came into contact with Jahangard.
“We don’t know exactly what happened, but [Jahangard] falls down, hits his head on the driveway, and it’s a catastrophic injury,” Samuel said. “There was absolutely no intent on the part of Mr. Schmitt to strike the victim. There was no intent to injure him. He stayed on the scene, talking to the police for three hours and was then allowed to drive home with his car.”
He added: “You can call it reckless driving or making an improper turn but to call that malice murder is a disgraceful use of the murder statute. When there’s no evidence that the car came into contact with the victim and no evidence that the [defendant] struck the [victim] directly, I don’t know why you would call that murder—a motor vehicle accident, maybe even a criminal one, but not malice murder.”
A graduate of Georgia State University College of Law and member in good standing of the State Bar since 2015, Schmitt served in the military for seven years, honorably discharged as a U.S. Army captain, before attending law school, his lawyer said. In addition, he has no criminal record of any kind and no history whatsoever of anger issues or prior driving incidents, Samuel said.
Schmitt’s next court date is a preliminary hearing scheduled for Aug. 27. Although Manhattan Associates officials declined to return two phone calls from the Daily Report asking for information about Schmitt’s current employment status, Samuel said executives there have been very supportive of their employee.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readAppeals Court Removes Fulton DA From Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Others
6 minute readFamily of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
5 minute readFulton Judge Rejects Attempt by Trump Campaign Lawyer to Invalidate Guilty Plea in Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250