Ga. Civil Rights Lawyers Object to Voter Purge in Decatur
“The registered voters at 444 Sycamore Drive appear to be among the most vulnerable among us and hardest hit by life’s struggles,” ACLU of Georgia Legal Director Sean J. Young of Atlanta and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Counsel John Powers of Washington, D.C., said in a letter to the DeKalb Board of Registration and Elections Tuesday.
August 20, 2019 at 11:47 PM
3 minute read
Civil rights lawyers are challenging a purge of voter rolls for people who gave one particular address in Decatur.
“The ACLU of Georgia and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law write on behalf of the New Georgia Project and the Georgia Coalition for the Peoples’ Agenda in response to a voter purge of Decatur residents approved during your August 1, 2019 meeting,” ACLU of Georgia Legal Director Sean J. Young of Atlanta and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Counsel John Powers of Washington, D.C., said in a letter to the DeKalb Board of Registration and Elections Tuesday.
As Exhibit A, the letter included minutes showing the board “categorically purged several voters, including all of those who listed as their residence 444 Sycamore Drive, Decatur, GA 30030.”
“Your stated reason for the purge was that this address ‘is a business where clients can only stay for three days, and citizens cannot register at a business,’ and that based on your ‘understanding,’ ‘at one point, it was a residence.’ The minutes, however, do not cite to any evidence in support of these assertions,” Young and Powers said.
“The registered voters at 444 Sycamore Drive appear to be among the most vulnerable among us and hardest hit by life’s struggles,” Young and Powers continued.
The letter included as Exhibit B information on the Peer Support, Wellness, and Respite Center, located at that address. The exhibit said the center is “freely available for people with mental disabilities who need housing to avoid psychiatric hospitalization, and where residents may stay up to seven nights (not three nights), in 30-day intervals presumably indefinitely.”
Young and Powers asserted that the building can serve as a residence for people struggling to find permanent housing. “Indeed, it may be the only home for people who are otherwise homeless, have challenging mental disabilities, and have nowhere else to turn,” they said.
The lawyers made an open records request for information pertaining to the purge and said it may have violated Georgia law.
“The board needs to explain its actions,” Young said in a news release Tuesday. “It is morally wrong for government officials to judge where someone calls home.”
In response to a request for comment from the Daily Report Tuesday, board Director Erica Hamilton defended the purge.
“The Decatur Peer Support and Wellness Center is not a place of residence,” Hamilton said in an email. “As always, anyone who would like to become a registered voter in DeKalb County, including the affected individuals, can register to vote using their address of residence in DeKalb County.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250