Ga. Civil Rights Lawyers Object to Voter Purge in Decatur
“The registered voters at 444 Sycamore Drive appear to be among the most vulnerable among us and hardest hit by life’s struggles,” ACLU of Georgia Legal Director Sean J. Young of Atlanta and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Counsel John Powers of Washington, D.C., said in a letter to the DeKalb Board of Registration and Elections Tuesday.
August 20, 2019 at 11:47 PM
3 minute read
Sean Young, legal director, ACLU of Georgia. (Photo: John Disney/ALM)
Civil rights lawyers are challenging a purge of voter rolls for people who gave one particular address in Decatur.
“The ACLU of Georgia and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law write on behalf of the New Georgia Project and the Georgia Coalition for the Peoples’ Agenda in response to a voter purge of Decatur residents approved during your August 1, 2019 meeting,” ACLU of Georgia Legal Director Sean J. Young of Atlanta and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Counsel John Powers of Washington, D.C., said in a letter to the DeKalb Board of Registration and Elections Tuesday.
As Exhibit A, the letter included minutes showing the board “categorically purged several voters, including all of those who listed as their residence 444 Sycamore Drive, Decatur, GA 30030.”
“Your stated reason for the purge was that this address ‘is a business where clients can only stay for three days, and citizens cannot register at a business,’ and that based on your ‘understanding,’ ‘at one point, it was a residence.’ The minutes, however, do not cite to any evidence in support of these assertions,” Young and Powers said.
“The registered voters at 444 Sycamore Drive appear to be among the most vulnerable among us and hardest hit by life’s struggles,” Young and Powers continued.
The letter included as Exhibit B information on the Peer Support, Wellness, and Respite Center, located at that address. The exhibit said the center is “freely available for people with mental disabilities who need housing to avoid psychiatric hospitalization, and where residents may stay up to seven nights (not three nights), in 30-day intervals presumably indefinitely.”
Young and Powers asserted that the building can serve as a residence for people struggling to find permanent housing. “Indeed, it may be the only home for people who are otherwise homeless, have challenging mental disabilities, and have nowhere else to turn,” they said.
The lawyers made an open records request for information pertaining to the purge and said it may have violated Georgia law.
“The board needs to explain its actions,” Young said in a news release Tuesday. “It is morally wrong for government officials to judge where someone calls home.”
In response to a request for comment from the Daily Report Tuesday, board Director Erica Hamilton defended the purge.
“The Decatur Peer Support and Wellness Center is not a place of residence,” Hamilton said in an email. “As always, anyone who would like to become a registered voter in DeKalb County, including the affected individuals, can register to vote using their address of residence in DeKalb County.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/04/Transgender-healthcare-767x633-1.jpg)
Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
![Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising? Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2021/02/Georgia-State-Capitol-Building-Article-202102261106.jpg)
Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
5 minute read![A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2021/09/Brian-Kemp-03-767x633.jpg)
A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Florida Bar Sues Miami Attorney for Frivolous Lawsuits
- 2Donald Trump Serves Only De Facto and Not De Jure: A Status That Voids His Acts Usurping the Power of Congress or the Courts
- 3Georgia Hacker Pleads Guilty in SEC X Account Scam That Moved Markets
- 4Trump's Pick for SEC Chair Likely to Stymie Shareholder Proposals from ESG Advocates
- 5Adobe’s Chief Cyber Legal & Privacy Officer Talks Managing Gen AI Risks, Cyber Training
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250