'Alarmed' and 'Displeased': DeKalb Election Superintendent Calls on Board to Rescind Voter Purge
DeKalb County Election Superintendent Dele Loman Smith has recommended that the county law department decide if the board violated the law when it removed registered voters living in Decatur.
August 22, 2019 at 06:41 PM
4 minute read
DeKalb County's election superintendent has called on the elections board to rescind a recent voter purge, saying she was "alarmed and profoundly displeased" by civil rights lawyers' claim it was illegal.
In an email obtained by the Daily Report that was sent to election officials and attorneys with the ACLU and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Thursday, Superintendent Dele Loman Smith recommended that the county law department decide whether the board violated the law when it categorically removed all registered voters listed at a single address in Decatur from the voter rolls.
The Peer Support, Wellness, and Respite Center is located at the address at issue and advertises itself as a center available to people with mental disabilities who need housing as an alternative to hospitalization.
Smith also recommended that the administrative coordinator for the DeKalb County Voter Registration and Elections office, who owns the property in question with her husband, be barred from further involvement in the matter due to a conflict of interest.
Smith called out administrator coordinator Mary Frances Weeks after Weeks responded on Thursday to an Aug. 20 letter from ACLU legal director Sean Young and John Powers, counsel for the Washington, D.C., lawyers committee. The letter, which included a public records request, put county election officials on notice that they do not have authority to determine what constitutes housing, "especially for those hardest hit by life's struggles."
The lawyers contended that the center may serve as a residence for people struggling to find permanent housing and may be the only address for people who are otherwise homeless.
In a letter delivered to the ACLU on Thursday, Weeks said she and her husband own the center. She said the challenge that led to the voter purge was first made by the city of Decatur, which couldn't identify 444
Sycamore Drive as a legitimate address.
Weeks said the legal address is actually 207 Springdale St., but because the driveway is at 444 Sycamore, it "is easier for the clients to locate it."
"Obviously, I was aware that no one resides there," she said. "If you need us to have the director confirm that there is no one living there, we will be happy to do so. … Regardless, there is no such address as 444 Sycamore Drive in Decatur."
Smith said she was never told about Weeks' conflict or that the voter purge "did not comply with the legal requirements that it be made by an elector rather than a city or other entity."
The lack of disclosure and Weeks' apparent conflict was compounded by having Weeks respond to the civil rights lawyers "in a manner that I found to be both defensive and unresponsive," Smith said. "I am alarmed and profoundly displeased to have learned more information about this matter from an outside organization than was shared by staff."
Smith said she voted for the purges in the belief that all pertinent facts were shared with the board and the letter of the law was followed. But, she continued, "I cannot carry out my duties as a board member if those basic expectations are not met. This situation has only exacerbated the distrust of the board among members of the public, and unless it is promptly and satisfactorily rectified, it will undermine the cohesive functioning of the board as well."
On Thursday, Young called Weeks' response on behalf of the elections board and the voter registration office "inadequate on its face."
"We look forward to reviewing all the documents concerning the purge," he said. "We just want to know what happened."
Powers said he was "puzzled" by Weeks' letter, which he said raises further questions about the actual reasons behind the purge.
"It is troubling that the board's official response came from an employee who has an interest in the property at the voters' address," he said. "The residents of DeKalb County, and especially the voters who were purged, deserve transparency and real answers about what motivated their removal from the voter rolls."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readJudge Sets Early 2025 Trial for Ex-Prosecutor Charged With Meddling in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
3 minute readFulton Reelects Willis as DA Amid Ongoing 2020 Election Case Against Trump
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 12025 Will Be a Turning Point for Crypto Counselor Laura Brookover
- 2Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency Practices Stand to Gain from Trump Election
- 3Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
- 4Fighting Injustice: Son Secures Father's Honorable Discharge From U.S. Air Force
- 5'A Giant in the Legal Community': a Fulton County Judge Has Died
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250