Vaping Company Targeted in Suit Claiming Teens Got Hooked
The complaint alleged JUUL"set out to develop and market a highly addictive product that could be packaged and sold to young people. Youth is and has always been the most sought-after market for cigarette companies because they are the most vulnerable to nicotine addiction and are most likely to become customers for life."
August 23, 2019 at 09:58 AM
5 minute read
Beasley Allen of Atlanta and Montgomery, Alabama, has filed a lawsuit against JUUL Labs of San Francisco on behalf of an Ohio mother who says her 14-year-old twin daughters became severely addicted to nicotine in middle school after using the company's candy-flavored vaping products disguised to look like flash drives for computers.
The company denied the charges and said it's only trying to offer a safer alternative for those already addicted to cigarettes—the real enemy.
Rene Arana is the plaintiff in the lawsuit in the Court of Common Pleas for Franklin, Ohio. She identified her teen daughters only by their initials.
"J.C. and A.C. are social, bright teenagers who have both developed severe nicotine addictions as a result of Defendants' orchestrated efforts to addict a new generation of teenagers to nicotine," Arana's complaint said. She said the addiction and nicotine withdrawals caused strong mood swings, bouts of anger and aggression, discipline problems, sudden decline in academic performance and even a suicide attempt.
"They continue to be addicted to nicotine, and this addiction will burden these girls for the remainder of their lives," the mother said. "Defendants' wrongful conduct in marketing, promoting, manufacturing, designing, and selling JUUL substantially contributed to J.C. and A.C.'s life-altering injuries."
The complaint tells a dark story of the company's rapid rise to profitability.
"In 2015, JUUL set out to recapture the magic of the most successful product ever made—the cigarette," Arana's complaint said. "Due to regulations and court orders preventing the major cigarette manufacturers from marketing to young people, youth smoking had decreased to its lowest levels in decades. While the public health community celebrated this decline as a victory, JUUL saw an opportunity. Seizing on regulatory inaction and loopholes for e-cigarettes, JUUL set out to develop and market a highly addictive product that could be packaged and sold to young people. Youth is and has always been the most sought-after market for cigarette companies because they are the most vulnerable to nicotine addiction and are most likely to become customers for life."
The mother's legal team includes Andy Birchfield and Joseph VanZandt of Beasley Allen of Atlanta and Montgomery, Alabama, along with Mark Troutman, Shawn Judge, and Gregory Travalio of Isaac, Wiles, Burkholder & Teetor in Columbus, Ohio.
They said Arana—like many parents, teachers and other adult authority figures—had no idea at first that the USB-looking item her girls had was a vaping device. But the complaint alleged that a JUUL pod delivers a higher concentration of nicotine than a pack of cigarettes, at the same time overriding burning in the throat that might slow a smoker down.
"JUUL has created a nicotine addiction epidemic in our country, and families like the Aranas are facing the real consequences caused by JUUL's reckless conduct," VanZandt said in a news release. "Everything JUUL did, from designing the product, manipulating the nicotine, and marketing to minors, was targeted at addicting young people to nicotine. JUUL has made billions of dollars on the backs of America's vulnerable youth; they must be held accountable."
A company spokesman denied the charges and pointed to cigarettes as the real villain.
"JUUL Labs is committed to eliminating combustible cigarettes, the number one cause of preventable death in the world," the spokesman said Thursday. "Our product has always only been intended to be a viable alternative for the one billion current adult smokers in the world. We have never marketed to youth and do not want any non-nicotine users to try our products."
The spokesman said the new complaint "largely copies and pastes unfounded allegations previously raised in other lawsuits which we have been actively contesting for over a year."
"Like the prior cases that this one copies, it is without merit and we will defend our mission throughout this process," the spokesman said. "We strongly advocate for Tobacco 21 legislation, we stopped the sale of non-tobacco and non-menthol based flavored JUULpods to our traditional retail store partners, enhanced our online age-verification process, strengthened our retailer compliance program with over 2,000 secret shopper visits per month, and shut down our Facebook and Instagram accounts while working constantly to remove inappropriate social media content generated by others on those platforms."
And the company called for regulation of its own industry.
"It was our hope that others in the category would self-impose similar restrictions to address youth usage," the spokesman said. "It is now our hope that regulators will impose these same restrictions to protect youth and to preserve the opportunity to eliminate combustible cigarettes, the deadliest legal consumer product known to man."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHungry for Stability After Execs Exit, Papa John's Gives Legal Chief Big Retention Bonus
4 minute readWalmart Ordered to Pay $1.2M by State Jury for Employee-Caused Injury in Georgia Store
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250