Ga. Opioid Litigation Moves to Business Court
"As we continue our multi-pronged fight against the opioid epidemic, we are pleased our lawsuit against opioid manufacturers and distributors has been transferred to the Business Case Division of the Gwinnett County Superior Court," Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr said.
August 27, 2019 at 12:59 PM
4 minute read
The Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Judges Committee has granted Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr's motion to transfer the state's opioid litigation to business court.
"As we continue our multi-pronged fight against the opioid epidemic, we are pleased our lawsuit against opioid manufacturers and distributors has been transferred to the Business Case Division of the Gwinnett County Superior Court," Carr said Tuesday in a news release. "This is the proper venue for a case of this complexity and is good news for the people of Georgia."
Carr hired outside counsel last year to handle opioid litigation. They filed a January lawsuit in Gwinnett County Superior Court against a long list of drugmakers, alleging that they fueled the opioid addiction crisis for profit with false advertising that understated the dangers and exaggerated the benefits of their products.
The complaint accused drugmakers of paying "front groups" and "key opinion leaders" to promote pills while deceptively appearing to be unbiased. The complaint alleged the drugmakers flooded the market with pills without providing the required monitoring, paving the way for improper use. And the complaint accused the companies of unleashing a deluge of opioids into Georgia, then failing to prevent the diversion of the drugs away from legitimate medical providers and pharmacies and into the black market. "These actions lit and fueled the ongoing opioid crisis, strained the state's coffers and imposed a crushing human toll on Georgia's communities," Carr said.
The case requires a forum equipped to handle its "inevitably significant demands" on the court's time and resources," Carr said. "The Business Court is such a forum."
When the statewide business court opens for business in January 2020, it will work with the Metro Atlanta Business Case Division, including the business court in Gwinnett that now has the opioid litigation.
Gov. Brian Kemp named Jones Day partner Walt Davis to head the new statewide business court in July. The Legislature confirmed Davis earlier this month.
The lawsuit seeks injunctive relief, damages and restitution. With it, Georgia joins a growing number of states and cities that have filed similar lawsuits in both state and federal courts.
Carr hired a team last September that includes a powerhouse plaintiffs firm from Alabama and some well-known litigators in Georgia to investigate and file lawsuits against makers and sellers of opioid drugs. Those firms are working a contingency-fee arrangement. The group includes: John Bevis of the Barnes Law Group in Marietta as a special assistant attorney general for opioid litigation. The Barnes Law Group is working with The Cooper Firm in Marietta, Franklin Law in Savannah, and Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles in Montgomery and Atlanta.
"No Georgia community is a stranger to the devastating effects of the opioid crisis," Carr said when the suit was filed. "We are bringing this lawsuit quite simply to seek justice for the citizens of Georgia. It is imperative that we recover for the widespread damage that has been caused by this epidemic."
Carr said in announcing the legal team last year that he would dedicate "every available resource our office has to fight the opioid epidemic—whether by increasing communication and coordination through our Statewide Opioid Task Force, cracking down on illegal prescribing through our Medicaid Fraud Control Unit or conducting training opportunities for law enforcement and prosecutors through our national partnerships."
Purdue Pharma tops a long list of corporate defendants. The company did not respond immediately to the news Tuesday. But Purdue shared this statement previously:
"We are deeply troubled by the opioid crisis and we are dedicated to being part of the solution. As a company grounded in science, we must balance patient access to FDA-approved medicines, while working collaboratively to solve this public health challenge. Although our products account for approximately 2% of the total opioid prescriptions, as a company, we've distributed the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, developed the first FDA-approved opioid medication with abuse-deterrent properties and partner with law enforcement to ensure access to naloxone. We vigorously deny these allegations and look forward to the opportunity to present our defense."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDrugmaker Wins $70.5M After Fed Judge Says Generic Sales Were Blocked
4 minute read5-Year Litigation Against Metro Atlanta Pharmacy Headed for Trial After Interlocutory Appeal Denied
Opioid Defendant Motions to Disqualify Motley Rice Over Alleged Ethical Concerns
5 minute readAbortion Rights Set to Return to Supreme Court With Mifepristone Case
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250