Claims Filed for Dads Separated from Kids at the Border
"Thousands of children and parents will live with intense trauma the rest of their lives as a result of this policy, which the administration knew would leave indelible scars on these families," said Michelle Lapointe, senior supervising attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center.
August 30, 2019 at 05:41 PM
4 minute read
Civil rights attorneys with the Southern Poverty Law Center in Atlanta and Covington and Burling in Washington, D.C., filed complaints against the federal government Thursday on behalf of fathers separated from their children at the southern U.S. border with Mexico.
The fathers are seeking compensation for the trauma to their children, a boy and a girl, both 11. They were fleeing Guatemala after threats on their lives and the rape of another girl in one of the families, according to the suit, which claims the families have suffered and will continue to suffer damage to their mental, physical and emotional health for years to come.
The two suits filed Thursday are the latest in a series of complaints filed by the same lawyers.
Lawyers listed on the complaint for the fathers include Michelle Lapointe of the Southern Poverty Law Center in Decatur, Georgia, and Matthew Schlesinger of Covington in Washington.
"Thousands of children and parents will live with intense trauma the rest of their lives as a result of this policy, which the administration knew would leave indelible scars on these families," Lapointe, senior supervising attorney at the SPLC, said in a news release Friday. "The government must be held accountable for its actions and it must put a stop to this practice once and for all."
The filings describe cruelty of both the practice of family separation and the treatment of these families while in federal custody. The lawyers said the the well-documented intent of the family separations was to deter future migrants by deliberately subjecting immigrants in custody to harsh conditions that would ensure their suffering.
"The harm inflicted on these fathers, their children and their entire families can never be undone," said Jay Carey, a partner at Covington. "But those responsible for their pain can and must be held accountable. And a message must be sent to this administration—which has acted in the name of the American people—that such cruelty will not be tolerated here or in any civilized society."
During the summer of 2018, the SPLC, through its Southeast Immigrant Freedom Initiative, worked with more than 40 families who were separated at the border and sent to Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers in Georgia and Louisiana. In addition to these claims, the SPLC and Covington have filed complaints on behalf of five other families who claim they were separated and continue to suffer as a result.
The U.S. Justice Department did not respond immediately to a request for comment on the latest filings.
The complaints identified the children and their fathers by their initials.
"Between mid-2017 and late 2018, the United States government forcibly took thousands of children from their parents, sending them to facilities and foster homes hundreds of miles away. These families often had fled persecution in their home countries, only to encounter it in the very place they sought refuge," one of the complaints said. "After being separated, children and their parents often were unable to communicate for weeks or months. Parents did not know whether their children were safe—or even where their children were. Children could not understand what had happened to them. The government tore apart families, subjecting children and parents to months of terror, anguish, and torment. The government understood the harm that it was inflicting on these families. It took children from their parents not in spite of the harm, but because of it, intending that the terror inflicted on these families would deter other families from migrating to the United States."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Trending Stories
- 1The Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Push Into Law Firms
- 2Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 3'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 4Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 5Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250